Jackson County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 4,775 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -14 - Diaz14 - Diaz | 122 | 273 | 5 | 400 | 30.5% | 68.3% | R+37.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -38 - Newport Ward 4-A38 - Newport Ward 4-A | 63 | 285 | 13 | 361 | 17.5% | 78.9% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -39 - Newport Ward 4-B39 - Newport Ward 4-B | 95 | 246 | 8 | 349 | 27.2% | 70.5% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -45 - Swifton45 - Swifton | 77 | 248 | 2 | 327 | 23.5% | 75.8% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -26 - New Glaise26 - New Glaise | 27 | 264 | 5 | 296 | 9.1% | 89.2% | R+80.1 |
| Precinct -47 - Tuckerman Ward 247 - Tuckerman Ward 2 | 37 | 210 | 6 | 253 | 14.6% | 83.0% | R+68.4 |
| Precinct -36 - Newport Ward 2-C36 - Newport Ward 2-C | 54 | 182 | 2 | 238 | 22.7% | 76.5% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -37 - Newport Ward 2-B37 - Newport Ward 2-B | 89 | 138 | 8 | 235 | 37.9% | 58.7% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -11 - Crossroads -3711 - Crossroads -37 | 14 | 173 | 2 | 189 | 7.4% | 91.5% | R+84.1 |
| Precinct -48 - Tuckerman Ward 348 - Tuckerman Ward 3 | 48 | 135 | 1 | 184 | 26.1% | 73.4% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -46 - Tuckerman Ward 146 - Tuckerman Ward 1 | 32 | 138 | 3 | 173 | 18.5% | 79.8% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -17 - Grubbs17 - Grubbs | 23 | 132 | 3 | 158 | 14.6% | 83.5% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -30 - Newport Ward 1-B30 - Newport Ward 1-B | 100 | 36 | 1 | 137 | 73.0% | 26.3% | D+46.7 |
| Precinct -49 - Tuckerman Outside49 - Tuckerman Outside | 29 | 82 | 3 | 114 | 25.4% | 71.9% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -34 - Newport Ward 3-B34 - Newport Ward 3-B | 24 | 64 | 3 | 91 | 26.4% | 70.3% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -09 - Campbell Station09 - Campbell Station | 16 | 71 | 2 | 89 | 18.0% | 79.8% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -02 - Alcorn02 - Alcorn | 49 | 32 | 1 | 82 | 59.8% | 39.0% | D+20.7 |
| Precinct -07 - Beedeville07 - Beedeville | 5 | 72 | 5 | 82 | 6.1% | 87.8% | R+81.7 |
| Precinct -28 - Newport Ward 2-A28 - Newport Ward 2-A | 40 | 38 | 3 | 81 | 49.4% | 46.9% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -12 - Denmark12 - Denmark | 15 | 64 | 0 | 79 | 19.0% | 81.0% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -35 - Newport Ward 3-C35 - Newport Ward 3-C | 44 | 33 | 2 | 79 | 55.7% | 41.8% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -43 - Remmel43 - Remmel | 14 | 62 | 2 | 78 | 17.9% | 79.5% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -22 - Jacksonport22 - Jacksonport | 21 | 48 | 0 | 69 | 30.4% | 69.6% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct -42 - Penninghton Balch42 - Penninghton Balch | 7 | 51 | 0 | 58 | 12.1% | 87.9% | R+75.9 |
| Precinct -33 - Newport Ward 3-A33 - Newport Ward 3-A | 20 | 32 | 1 | 53 | 37.7% | 60.4% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -21 - Island21 - Island | 9 | 41 | 0 | 50 | 18.0% | 82.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -18 - Hickory Grove18 - Hickory Grove | 8 | 39 | 0 | 47 | 17.0% | 83.0% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -24 - Liberty24 - Liberty | 5 | 42 | 0 | 47 | 10.6% | 89.4% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -51 - Waters Store51 - Waters Store | 5 | 41 | 0 | 46 | 10.9% | 89.1% | R+78.3 |
| Precinct -01 - Airbase01 - Airbase | 9 | 34 | 0 | 43 | 20.9% | 79.1% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -31 - Newport Ward 1-A31 - Newport Ward 1-A | 37 | 6 | 0 | 43 | 86.0% | 14.0% | D+72.1 |
| Precinct -50 - Tupelo50 - Tupelo | 6 | 37 | 0 | 43 | 14.0% | 86.0% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -05 - Auvergne05 - Auvergne | 11 | 26 | 0 | 37 | 29.7% | 70.3% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -15 - Gourdneck - Citizenship15 - Gourdneck - Citizenship | 3 | 29 | 1 | 33 | 9.1% | 87.9% | R+78.8 |
| Precinct -04 - Amagon04 - Amagon | 4 | 24 | 0 | 28 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -40 - Old Glaise40 - Old Glaise | 3 | 24 | 0 | 27 | 11.1% | 88.9% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -52 - Weldon52 - Weldon | 3 | 17 | 0 | 20 | 15.0% | 85.0% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -16 - Greenhaw16 - Greenhaw | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -19 - Horseshoe19 - Horseshoe | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -25 - Macks25 - Macks | 3 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 30.0% | 60.0% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -03 - Algoa03 - Algoa | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 22.2% | 77.8% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -44 - Shoffner44 - Shoffner | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -08 - Blackville08 - Blackville | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 60.0% | 40.0% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -20 - Ingleside20 - Ingleside | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -41 - Olyphant41 - Olyphant | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +37.1% |
| 1896 | +45.7% |
| 1900 | +27.2% |
| 1904 | +4.8% |
| 1908 | +9.4% |
| 1912 | +17.3% |
| 1916 | +47.9% |
| 1920 | +15.8% |
| 1924 | +43.9% |
| 1928 | +37.1% |
| 1932 | +85.5% |
| 1936 | +73.6% |
| 1940 | +70.1% |
| 1944 | +69.7% |
| 1948 | +72.1% |
| 1952 | +48.8% |
| 1956 | +46.9% |
| 1960 | +16.9% |
| 1964 | +36.8% |
| 1968 | +10.0% |
| 1972 | −33.5% |
| 1976 | +56.7% |
| 1980 | +18.1% |
| 1984 | +1.7% |
| 1988 | +15.8% |
| 1992 | +40.9% |
| 1996 | +42.8% |
| 2000 | +22.6% |
| 2004 | +14.3% |
| 2008 | −16.3% |
| 2012 | −18.3% |
| 2016 | −33.9% |
| 2020 | −43.8% |
| 2024 | −48.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 24.6%988 | 72.6%2,913 | 4,012 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 75.9%3,732 | 4,914 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 8,341 |
| 2020 | 7,908 |
| 2022 | 8,157 |
| 2024 | 7,473 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+169 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −596 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $32,684 in average income, against $56,816 for residents who stayed — 42% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+53.2 on average — 4.4 points more Republican-leaning than Jackson County, AR itself (R+48.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- White County, AR54R+61.2
- Independence County, AR48R+59.5
- Craighead County, AR47R+37.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Craighead County, AR56
- Independence County, AR41
- White County, AR35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −119 |
| 2012 | −183 |
| 2013 | +81 |
| 2014 | −127 |
| 2015 | −153 |
| 2016 | −67 |
| 2017 | −221 |
| 2018 | −240 |
| 2019 | −12 |
| 2021 | +156 |
| 2022 | −55 |
| 2023 | +214 |
| 2024 | −39 |
| 2025 | +169 |
Jackson County sits in Arkansas's Mississippi Delta lowlands, where a declining rural population and an aging demographic profile have produced some of the state's most lopsided federal election results in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 85.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 48.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 48.7 points.
A population of 16,712, a 75% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $44,218 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hot Spring County and Poinsett County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Jackson County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05067/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.