White County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
92 precincts · 30,837 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -32 - Gray B32 - Gray B | 286 | 1,584 | 31 | 1,901 | 15.0% | 83.3% | R+68.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -72 - Searcy Ward 2 C72 - Searcy Ward 2 C | 326 | 1,084 | 34 | 1,444 | 22.6% | 75.1% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -36 - Harrison36 - Harrison | 129 | 1,117 | 24 | 1,270 | 10.2% | 88.0% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -69 - Searcy Ward 1 D69 - Searcy Ward 1 D | 237 | 865 | 40 | 1,142 | 20.8% | 75.7% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -82 - Union82 - Union | 138 | 893 | 13 | 1,044 | 13.2% | 85.5% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -90 - Beebe Ward 3 C90 - Beebe Ward 3 C | 190 | 765 | 17 | 972 | 19.5% | 78.7% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -81 - Searcy Ward 2 E81 - Searcy Ward 2 E | 205 | 706 | 34 | 945 | 21.7% | 74.7% | R+53.0 |
| Precinct -34 - Gum Springs34 - Gum Springs | 96 | 638 | 22 | 756 | 12.7% | 84.4% | R+71.7 |
| Precinct -93 - Searcy Ward 3 E93 - Searcy Ward 3 E | 177 | 525 | 19 | 721 | 24.5% | 72.8% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -09 - Beebe Ward 309 - Beebe Ward 3 | 180 | 506 | 23 | 709 | 25.4% | 71.4% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -16 - Chrisp16 - Chrisp | 117 | 534 | 14 | 665 | 17.6% | 80.3% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -15 - Cane15 - Cane | 94 | 549 | 11 | 654 | 14.4% | 83.9% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -31 - Gray A31 - Gray A | 88 | 519 | 19 | 626 | 14.1% | 82.9% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -07 - Beebe Ward 107 - Beebe Ward 1 | 180 | 427 | 17 | 624 | 28.8% | 68.4% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -73 - Searcy Ward 2 D73 - Searcy Ward 2 D | 160 | 441 | 20 | 621 | 25.8% | 71.0% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -19 - Coffey19 - Coffey | 86 | 518 | 15 | 619 | 13.9% | 83.7% | R+69.8 |
| Precinct -24 - Des Arc24 - Des Arc | 63 | 447 | 8 | 518 | 12.2% | 86.3% | R+74.1 |
| Precinct -08 - Beebe Ward 208 - Beebe Ward 2 | 110 | 366 | 15 | 491 | 22.4% | 74.5% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -80 - Searcy Ward 4 C80 - Searcy Ward 4 C | 143 | 312 | 22 | 477 | 30.0% | 65.4% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -54 - Marshall54 - Marshall | 50 | 410 | 6 | 466 | 10.7% | 88.0% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -75 - Searcy Ward 3 B75 - Searcy Ward 3 B | 143 | 308 | 10 | 461 | 31.0% | 66.8% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -76 - Searcy Ward 3 C76 - Searcy Ward 3 C | 121 | 320 | 10 | 451 | 26.8% | 71.0% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -10 - Big Creek10 - Big Creek | 53 | 388 | 2 | 443 | 12.0% | 87.6% | R+75.6 |
| Precinct -35 - Guthrie35 - Guthrie | 33 | 363 | 3 | 399 | 8.3% | 91.0% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -83 - Velvet Ridge83 - Velvet Ridge | 48 | 336 | 5 | 389 | 12.3% | 86.4% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -02 - Antioch02 - Antioch | 60 | 321 | 6 | 387 | 15.5% | 82.9% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -17 - Clay17 - Clay | 35 | 326 | 6 | 367 | 9.5% | 88.8% | R+79.3 |
| Precinct -50 - Kentucky50 - Kentucky | 58 | 276 | 4 | 338 | 17.2% | 81.7% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -26 - El Paso26 - El Paso | 58 | 272 | 5 | 335 | 17.3% | 81.2% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -92 - Searcy Ward 1 E92 - Searcy Ward 1 E | 82 | 248 | 4 | 334 | 24.6% | 74.3% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -63 - Royal63 - Royal | 56 | 271 | 5 | 332 | 16.9% | 81.6% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -41 - Jefferson41 - Jefferson | 45 | 278 | 5 | 328 | 13.7% | 84.8% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -71 - Searcy Ward 2 B71 - Searcy Ward 2 B | 85 | 230 | 8 | 323 | 26.3% | 71.2% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -03 - Bald Knob Ward 103 - Bald Knob Ward 1 | 79 | 235 | 4 | 318 | 24.8% | 73.9% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -05 - Bald knob Ward 305 - Bald knob Ward 3 | 44 | 265 | 7 | 316 | 13.9% | 83.9% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -52 - Liberty52 - Liberty | 40 | 257 | 3 | 300 | 13.3% | 85.7% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -06 - Bald Knob TWP06 - Bald Knob TWP | 42 | 251 | 4 | 297 | 14.1% | 84.5% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -68 - Searcy Ward 1 C68 - Searcy Ward 1 C | 84 | 187 | 16 | 287 | 29.3% | 65.2% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -74 - Searcy Ward 3 A74 - Searcy Ward 3 A | 89 | 184 | 13 | 286 | 31.1% | 64.3% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -91 - Harrison East91 - Harrison East | 41 | 241 | 3 | 285 | 14.4% | 84.6% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -78 - Searcy Ward 4 A78 - Searcy Ward 4 A | 73 | 199 | 12 | 284 | 25.7% | 70.1% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -66 - Searcy Ward 1 A66 - Searcy Ward 1 A | 91 | 184 | 7 | 282 | 32.3% | 65.2% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -43 - Judsonia Ward 143 - Judsonia Ward 1 | 43 | 230 | 1 | 274 | 15.7% | 83.9% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -37 - Hartsell37 - Hartsell | 25 | 245 | 2 | 272 | 9.2% | 90.1% | R+80.9 |
| Precinct -21 - Crosby21 - Crosby | 28 | 235 | 3 | 266 | 10.5% | 88.3% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -42 - Joy42 - Joy | 36 | 214 | 7 | 257 | 14.0% | 83.3% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -57 - McRae TWP57 - McRae TWP | 39 | 200 | 5 | 244 | 16.0% | 82.0% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -47 - Kensett Ward 247 - Kensett Ward 2 | 68 | 167 | 5 | 240 | 28.3% | 69.6% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -79 - Searcy Ward 4 B79 - Searcy Ward 4 B | 67 | 150 | 10 | 227 | 29.5% | 66.1% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -23 - Denmark23 - Denmark | 36 | 184 | 1 | 221 | 16.3% | 83.3% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -20 - Coldwell20 - Coldwell | 19 | 198 | 3 | 220 | 8.6% | 90.0% | R+81.4 |
| Precinct -62 - Rose Bud City62 - Rose Bud City | 36 | 172 | 2 | 210 | 17.1% | 81.9% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -87 - Bald Knob North87 - Bald Knob North | 36 | 168 | 0 | 204 | 17.6% | 82.4% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -44 - Judsonia Ward 244 - Judsonia Ward 2 | 27 | 158 | 6 | 191 | 14.1% | 82.7% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -14 - Cadron14 - Cadron | 17 | 165 | 3 | 185 | 9.2% | 89.2% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -38 - Higginson TWP38 - Higginson TWP | 33 | 148 | 2 | 183 | 18.0% | 80.9% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -77 - Searcy Ward 3 D77 - Searcy Ward 3 D | 81 | 99 | 3 | 183 | 44.3% | 54.1% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -04 - Bald Knob Ward 204 - Bald Knob Ward 2 | 38 | 140 | 2 | 180 | 21.1% | 77.8% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -30 - Gravel Hill30 - Gravel Hill | 24 | 153 | 2 | 179 | 13.4% | 85.5% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -40 - Jackson40 - Jackson | 17 | 155 | 4 | 176 | 9.7% | 88.1% | R+78.4 |
| Precinct -49 - Kensett TWP49 - Kensett TWP | 27 | 138 | 6 | 171 | 15.8% | 80.7% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -45 - Judsonia Ward 345 - Judsonia Ward 3 | 25 | 117 | 4 | 146 | 17.1% | 80.1% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -01 - Albion01 - Albion | 19 | 115 | 7 | 141 | 13.5% | 81.6% | R+68.1 |
| Precinct -61 - Red River61 - Red River | 21 | 88 | 1 | 110 | 19.1% | 80.0% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -65 - Russell TWP65 - Russell TWP | 19 | 87 | 2 | 108 | 17.6% | 80.6% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -13 - Bradford Ward 313 - Bradford Ward 3 | 17 | 88 | 1 | 106 | 16.0% | 83.0% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -51 - Letona51 - Letona | 12 | 87 | 4 | 103 | 11.7% | 84.5% | R+72.8 |
| Precinct -28 - Garner TWP28 - Garner TWP | 11 | 87 | 3 | 101 | 10.9% | 86.1% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -59 - Pangburn Ward 159 - Pangburn Ward 1 | 19 | 77 | 4 | 100 | 19.0% | 77.0% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -56 - McRae Ward 256 - McRae Ward 2 | 16 | 79 | 4 | 99 | 16.2% | 79.8% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -46 - Kensett Ward 146 - Kensett Ward 1 | 47 | 47 | 2 | 96 | 49.0% | 49.0% | Even |
| Precinct -53 - Marion53 - Marion | 12 | 83 | 1 | 96 | 12.5% | 86.5% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -55 - McRae Ward 155 - McRae Ward 1 | 16 | 74 | 1 | 91 | 17.6% | 81.3% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -22 - Cypert22 - Cypert | 8 | 77 | 1 | 86 | 9.3% | 89.5% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -84 - Walker84 - Walker | 4 | 78 | 2 | 84 | 4.8% | 92.9% | R+88.1 |
| Precinct -29 - Garner City29 - Garner City | 11 | 65 | 4 | 80 | 13.8% | 81.3% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -25 - Dogwood TWP25 - Dogwood TWP | 9 | 70 | 0 | 79 | 11.4% | 88.6% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -96 - Higginson Ward 396 - Higginson Ward 3 | 14 | 63 | 1 | 78 | 17.9% | 80.8% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -12 - Bradford Ward 212 - Bradford Ward 2 | 9 | 65 | 3 | 77 | 11.7% | 84.4% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -94 - Pangburn Ward 394 - Pangburn Ward 3 | 15 | 60 | 2 | 77 | 19.5% | 77.9% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -48 - Kensett Ward 348 - Kensett Ward 3 | 20 | 52 | 4 | 76 | 26.3% | 68.4% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -18 - Cleveland18 - Cleveland | 11 | 60 | 2 | 73 | 15.1% | 82.2% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -39 - Higginson Ward 139 - Higginson Ward 1 | 13 | 57 | 3 | 73 | 17.8% | 78.1% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -58 - Mt. Pisgah58 - Mt. Pisgah | 9 | 63 | 1 | 73 | 12.3% | 86.3% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -33 - Griffithville City33 - Griffithville City | 11 | 49 | 5 | 65 | 16.9% | 75.4% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -95 - Higginson Ward 295 - Higginson Ward 2 | 10 | 52 | 1 | 63 | 15.9% | 82.5% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -64 - Russell City64 - Russell City | 17 | 40 | 1 | 58 | 29.3% | 69.0% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -60 - Pangburn Ward 260 - Pangburn Ward 2 | 14 | 41 | 2 | 57 | 24.6% | 71.9% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -11 - Bradford Ward 111 - Bradford Ward 1 | 4 | 38 | 3 | 45 | 8.9% | 84.4% | R+75.6 |
| Precinct -86 - Georgetown City86 - Georgetown City | 3 | 36 | 0 | 39 | 7.7% | 92.3% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -85 - West Point85 - West Point | 4 | 31 | 0 | 35 | 11.4% | 88.6% | R+77.1 |
| Precinct -27 - Francure27 - Francure | 9 | 23 | 0 | 32 | 28.1% | 71.9% | R+43.8 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +25.7% |
| 1896 | +67.0% |
| 1900 | +32.9% |
| 1904 | +26.1% |
| 1908 | +29.7% |
| 1912 | +42.4% |
| 1916 | +61.5% |
| 1920 | +20.2% |
| 1924 | +33.0% |
| 1928 | +8.0% |
| 1932 | +76.1% |
| 1936 | +64.6% |
| 1940 | +58.2% |
| 1944 | +30.6% |
| 1948 | +51.0% |
| 1952 | +18.3% |
| 1956 | +12.4% |
| 1960 | +12.8% |
| 1964 | +13.2% |
| 1968 | −5.7% |
| 1972 | −35.1% |
| 1976 | +41.2% |
| 1980 | +3.9% |
| 1984 | −30.7% |
| 1988 | −22.7% |
| 1992 | +9.1% |
| 1996 | +7.4% |
| 2000 | −21.8% |
| 2004 | −29.8% |
| 2008 | −47.2% |
| 2012 | −53.7% |
| 2016 | −59.0% |
| 2020 | −58.9% |
| 2024 | −61.2% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 16.2%3,732 | 80.2%18,497 | 23,052 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 80.9%24,887 | 30,759 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 43,955 |
| 2020 | 44,997 |
| 2022 | 45,051 |
| 2024 | 46,212 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,069 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,798 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,550 in average income, against $68,519 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+33.5 on average — 28 points more Democratic-leaning than White County, AR itself (R+61.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lonoke County, AR344R+53.7
- Pulaski County, AR200D+22.1
- Faulkner County, AR130R+32.3
- Cleburne County, AR112R+67.9
- Independence County, AR73R+59.5
- Craighead County, AR38R+37.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lonoke County, AR238
- Pulaski County, AR216
- Faulkner County, AR133
- Cleburne County, AR106
- Jackson County, AR54
- Craighead County, AR48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +505 |
| 2012 | +331 |
| 2013 | −362 |
| 2014 | −297 |
| 2015 | +193 |
| 2016 | −119 |
| 2017 | −115 |
| 2018 | −498 |
| 2019 | +360 |
| 2021 | +385 |
| 2022 | +742 |
| 2023 | +947 |
| 2024 | +657 |
| 2025 | +1,069 |
White County has delivered lopsided Republican presidential margins for decades, with its largely rural, working-class population centered on Searcy anchoring some of the widest partisan gaps in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 76.1 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 61.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 61.2 points.
A population of 77,838, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $55,249 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Stephens County and Crawford County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
White County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05145/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.