HarrisDemocratic45.1%43,779TrumpRepublican51.7%50,243KennedyIndependent1.4%1,384
R+6.7- Lead
- 6,464
- Total
- 97,158
- vs nation
- R+5.2
- Turnout
- 55.5%
Akashiccounty
Washington County, AR
Contests in this Place (86 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 55.5% of 176,304 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic46.5%43,824TrumpRepublican50.4%47,504JorgensenLibertarian1.5%1,414
R+3.9- Lead
- 3,680
- Total
- 94,266
- vs nation
- R+8.4
- Turnout
- 58.3%
ClintonDemocratic42.7%33,366TrumpRepublican53.0%41,476JohnsonLibertarian4.3%3,360
R+10.4- Lead
- 8,110
- Total
- 78,202
- vs nation
- R+12.5
- Turnout
- 56.1%
ObamaDemocratic40.1%28,236RomneyRepublican56.3%39,688GrayLibertarian2.3%1,651
R+16.3- Lead
- 11,452
- Total
- 70,460
- vs nation
- R+20.1
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic42.4%29,021McCainRepublican55.5%37,963OtherAll other candidates2.0%1,396
R+13.1- Lead
- 8,942
- Total
- 68,380
- vs nation
- R+20.3
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic43.1%27,597BushRepublican55.7%35,726OtherAll other candidates1.2%780
R+12.7- Lead
- 8,129
- Total
- 64,103
- vs nation
- R+10.2
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic41.6%21,425BushRepublican54.9%28,231NaderGreen2.3%1,208
R+13.2- Lead
- 6,806
- Total
- 51,459
- vs nation
- R+13.7
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic46.4%20,419DoleRepublican44.3%19,476PerotReform7.1%3,133
D+2.1- Lead
- 943
- Total
- 43,967
- vs nation
- R+6.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+6.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 256,7652024 5-year
- Population density
- 273 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 942 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $70,6392024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 59.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 18.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+52.6 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+42.2 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Tulsa County, OK · twin score 87.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 55.5%97,917 participants ÷ 176,304 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.8 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- +1.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 39.7%–40.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97,917 | 176,304 ± 1,244 | 55.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 72,591 | 170,905 ± 1,334 | 42.5% | Audited | C/A |
| 94,783 | 162,559 ± 1,173 | 58.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 66,147 | 155,141 ± 1,012 | 42.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 82,607 | 147,315 ± 911 | 56.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 70,460 | 137,344 | 51.3% | Derived | — | |
| 68,380 | 130,994 | 52.2% | Derived | — | |
| 64,103 | 124,644 extrapolated | 51.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Washington County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Washington County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Fred Love0—
Supha Xayprasith-Mays0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 219 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
219 precincts · 97,139 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Fay 40Fay 40 | 1,040 | 791 | 69 | 1,900 | 54.7% | 41.6% | D+13.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Fay 20Fay 20 | 1,005 | 761 | 61 | 1,827 | 55.0% | 41.7% | D+13.4 |
| Precinct -Farmington-2Farmington-2 | 611 | 1,094 | 47 | 1,752 | 34.9% | 62.4% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 12Spg 12 | 718 | 972 | 54 | 1,744 | 41.2% | 55.7% | R+14.6 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr City-1Prairie Gr City-1 | 482 | 1,201 | 48 | 1,731 | 27.8% | 69.4% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -Tontitown City-6Tontitown City-6 | 475 | 1,196 | 48 | 1,719 | 27.6% | 69.6% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 06Fay 06 | 1,048 | 530 | 48 | 1,626 | 64.5% | 32.6% | D+31.9 |
| Precinct -Elkins-1Elkins-1 | 545 | 947 | 56 | 1,548 | 35.2% | 61.2% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr City-2Prairie Gr City-2 | 422 | 1,056 | 43 | 1,521 | 27.7% | 69.4% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 19Fay 19 | 966 | 461 | 47 | 1,474 | 65.5% | 31.3% | D+34.3 |
| Precinct -Goshen City-1Goshen City-1 | 461 | 973 | 39 | 1,473 | 31.3% | 66.1% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -Fay 11Fay 11 | 721 | 679 | 53 | 1,453 | 49.6% | 46.7% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 08Fay 08 | 1,040 | 330 | 50 | 1,420 | 73.2% | 23.2% | D+50.0 |
| Precinct -Brush CreekBrush Creek | 403 | 952 | 41 | 1,396 | 28.9% | 68.2% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 30Fay 30 | 738 | 609 | 43 | 1,390 | 53.1% | 43.8% | D+9.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 12Fay 12 | 790 | 539 | 57 | 1,386 | 57.0% | 38.9% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Spg 04Spg 04 | 439 | 734 | 26 | 1,199 | 36.6% | 61.2% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -Tontitown City-1Tontitown City-1 | 351 | 809 | 30 | 1,190 | 29.5% | 68.0% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Fay 28Fay 28 | 641 | 472 | 39 | 1,152 | 55.6% | 41.0% | D+14.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 17Fay 17 | 739 | 367 | 36 | 1,142 | 64.7% | 32.1% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 14Spg 14 | 463 | 641 | 32 | 1,136 | 40.8% | 56.4% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 22Fay 22 | 717 | 367 | 40 | 1,124 | 63.8% | 32.7% | D+31.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 26Fay 26 | 639 | 444 | 41 | 1,124 | 56.9% | 39.5% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 03Fay 03 | 708 | 346 | 49 | 1,103 | 64.2% | 31.4% | D+32.8 |
| Precinct -Farmington-1Farmington-1 | 428 | 585 | 41 | 1,054 | 40.6% | 55.5% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 27Fay 27 | 580 | 423 | 31 | 1,034 | 56.1% | 40.9% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -Spg 17Spg 17 | 440 | 566 | 26 | 1,032 | 42.6% | 54.8% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 32Fay 32 | 511 | 486 | 34 | 1,031 | 49.6% | 47.1% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -Spg 03Spg 03 | 530 | 461 | 36 | 1,027 | 51.6% | 44.9% | D+6.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 05Fay 05 | 746 | 251 | 26 | 1,023 | 72.9% | 24.5% | D+48.4 |
| Precinct -Spg 11Spg 11 | 405 | 585 | 29 | 1,019 | 39.7% | 57.4% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 31Fay 31 | 537 | 419 | 37 | 993 | 54.1% | 42.2% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 09bFay 09b | 663 | 284 | 39 | 986 | 67.2% | 28.8% | D+38.4 |
| Precinct -Fay 23Fay 23 | 593 | 343 | 46 | 982 | 60.4% | 34.9% | D+25.5 |
| Precinct -Spg 15Spg 15 | 453 | 475 | 40 | 968 | 46.8% | 49.1% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -West Fork City-1West Fork City-1 | 329 | 578 | 34 | 941 | 35.0% | 61.4% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -Spg 18Spg 18 | 411 | 488 | 24 | 923 | 44.5% | 52.9% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -Litteral-3Litteral-3 | 318 | 559 | 39 | 916 | 34.7% | 61.0% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -Johnson City-1Johnson City-1 | 402 | 481 | 30 | 913 | 44.0% | 52.7% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -LincolnLincoln | 241 | 592 | 21 | 854 | 28.2% | 69.3% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -Farmington-3Farmington-3 | 279 | 549 | 21 | 849 | 32.9% | 64.7% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -Center-1Center-1 | 234 | 571 | 25 | 830 | 28.2% | 68.8% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 13Spg 13 | 454 | 340 | 25 | 819 | 55.4% | 41.5% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 29Fay 29 | 487 | 282 | 29 | 798 | 61.0% | 35.3% | D+25.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 56Fay 56 | 378 | 377 | 33 | 788 | 48.0% | 47.8% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 07Fay 07 | 599 | 161 | 26 | 786 | 76.2% | 20.5% | D+55.7 |
| Precinct -Spg Twp-2Spg Twp-2 | 214 | 530 | 12 | 756 | 28.3% | 70.1% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -Fay 13Fay 13 | 560 | 157 | 32 | 749 | 74.8% | 21.0% | D+53.8 |
| Precinct -Greenland City-1Greenland City-1 | 282 | 429 | 23 | 734 | 38.4% | 58.4% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Starr HillStarr Hill | 127 | 557 | 14 | 698 | 18.2% | 79.8% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -Fay 25Fay 25 | 585 | 85 | 22 | 692 | 84.5% | 12.3% | D+72.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 35Fay 35 | 393 | 271 | 16 | 680 | 57.8% | 39.9% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -Spg 06Spg 06 | 314 | 330 | 28 | 672 | 46.7% | 49.1% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -Spg 26Spg 26 | 172 | 469 | 29 | 670 | 25.7% | 70.0% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -Tontitown City-2Tontitown City-2 | 197 | 443 | 22 | 662 | 29.8% | 66.9% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -Elm Springs City-1Elm Springs City-1 | 162 | 485 | 13 | 660 | 24.5% | 73.5% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -Farmington-4Farmington-4 | 241 | 375 | 20 | 636 | 37.9% | 59.0% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 01Fay 01 | 353 | 251 | 22 | 626 | 56.4% | 40.1% | D+16.3 |
| Precinct -Elm Springs City-2Elm Springs City-2 | 135 | 465 | 19 | 619 | 21.8% | 75.1% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -Spg 07Spg 07 | 208 | 383 | 16 | 607 | 34.3% | 63.1% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -Fay 10Fay 10 | 347 | 194 | 21 | 562 | 61.7% | 34.5% | D+27.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 04Fay 04 | 376 | 153 | 26 | 555 | 67.7% | 27.6% | D+40.2 |
| Precinct -Spg 09Spg 09 | 302 | 231 | 21 | 554 | 54.5% | 41.7% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -Fay 34Fay 34 | 413 | 111 | 27 | 551 | 75.0% | 20.1% | D+54.8 |
| Precinct -Richland-3Richland-3 | 121 | 411 | 14 | 546 | 22.2% | 75.3% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 18Fay 18 | 354 | 150 | 29 | 533 | 66.4% | 28.1% | D+38.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 58Fay 58 | 305 | 190 | 19 | 514 | 59.3% | 37.0% | D+22.4 |
| Precinct -Cane Hill-1Cane Hill-1 | 131 | 366 | 12 | 509 | 25.7% | 71.9% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -Spg Twp-1Spg Twp-1 | 128 | 351 | 12 | 491 | 26.1% | 71.5% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr City-4Prairie Gr City-4 | 175 | 306 | 9 | 490 | 35.7% | 62.4% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -Spg 08Spg 08 | 175 | 292 | 21 | 488 | 35.9% | 59.8% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -Winslow TwpWinslow Twp | 132 | 337 | 14 | 483 | 27.3% | 69.8% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 2Prairie Twp 2 | 186 | 283 | 12 | 481 | 38.7% | 58.8% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -Spg 35Spg 35 | 177 | 292 | 12 | 481 | 36.8% | 60.7% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -Marrs Hill-1Marrs Hill-1 | 131 | 335 | 12 | 478 | 27.4% | 70.1% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 36Fay 36 | 328 | 126 | 18 | 472 | 69.5% | 26.7% | D+42.8 |
| Precinct -CrawfordCrawford | 142 | 320 | 8 | 470 | 30.2% | 68.1% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -Valley-1Valley-1 | 117 | 337 | 13 | 467 | 25.1% | 72.2% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -Wheeler-1Wheeler-1 | 159 | 286 | 15 | 460 | 34.6% | 62.2% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 29Spg 29 | 239 | 189 | 18 | 446 | 53.6% | 42.4% | D+11.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 09aFay 09a | 301 | 116 | 23 | 440 | 68.4% | 26.4% | D+42.0 |
| Precinct -West Fork Twp-1West Fork Twp-1 | 148 | 280 | 8 | 436 | 33.9% | 64.2% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -Spg 02Spg 02 | 209 | 202 | 18 | 429 | 48.7% | 47.1% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 16Spg 16 | 181 | 232 | 16 | 429 | 42.2% | 54.1% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 15Fay 15 | 250 | 168 | 8 | 426 | 58.7% | 39.4% | D+19.2 |
| Precinct -Spg 27Spg 27 | 122 | 289 | 10 | 421 | 29.0% | 68.6% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -Spg 05Spg 05 | 156 | 243 | 19 | 418 | 37.3% | 58.1% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -DurhamDurham | 114 | 284 | 19 | 417 | 27.3% | 68.1% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 5Prairie Twp 5 | 179 | 223 | 15 | 417 | 42.9% | 53.5% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 25Spg 25 | 140 | 261 | 14 | 415 | 33.7% | 62.9% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -WymanWyman | 128 | 266 | 18 | 412 | 31.1% | 64.6% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -Johnson City-3Johnson City-3 | 224 | 169 | 14 | 407 | 55.0% | 41.5% | D+13.5 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr Twp-2Prairie Gr Twp-2 | 110 | 280 | 15 | 405 | 27.2% | 69.1% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Spg 19Spg 19 | 169 | 220 | 15 | 404 | 41.8% | 54.5% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -Cove Creek-1Cove Creek-1 | 108 | 286 | 8 | 402 | 26.9% | 71.1% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -IllinoisIllinois | 53 | 344 | 5 | 402 | 13.2% | 85.6% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -Fay 46Fay 46 | 120 | 266 | 9 | 395 | 30.4% | 67.3% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 49Fay 49 | 228 | 148 | 18 | 394 | 57.9% | 37.6% | D+20.3 |
| Precinct -Spg 39Spg 39 | 182 | 182 | 19 | 383 | 47.5% | 47.5% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -Spg 10Spg 10 | 151 | 208 | 20 | 379 | 39.8% | 54.9% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -Spg 31Spg 31 | 165 | 169 | 16 | 350 | 47.1% | 48.3% | R+1.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 02Fay 02 | 241 | 90 | 13 | 344 | 70.1% | 26.2% | D+43.9 |
| Precinct -Spg 40Spg 40 | 168 | 163 | 11 | 342 | 49.1% | 47.7% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -Fay 42Fay 42 | 235 | 90 | 16 | 341 | 68.9% | 26.4% | D+42.5 |
| Precinct -Greenland Twp-1Greenland Twp-1 | 107 | 217 | 14 | 338 | 31.7% | 64.2% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -Fay 38Fay 38 | 214 | 110 | 7 | 331 | 64.7% | 33.2% | D+31.4 |
| Precinct -Lees CreekLees Creek | 129 | 191 | 9 | 329 | 39.2% | 58.1% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -Rheas MillRheas Mill | 49 | 260 | 5 | 314 | 15.6% | 82.8% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 14Fay 14 | 237 | 63 | 9 | 309 | 76.7% | 20.4% | D+56.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 50Fay 50 | 229 | 70 | 8 | 307 | 74.6% | 22.8% | D+51.8 |
| Precinct -Spg 28Spg 28 | 110 | 192 | 3 | 305 | 36.1% | 63.0% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 21Fay 21 | 191 | 97 | 12 | 300 | 63.7% | 32.3% | D+31.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 39Fay 39 | 143 | 140 | 13 | 296 | 48.3% | 47.3% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 59Fay 59 | 154 | 129 | 7 | 290 | 53.1% | 44.5% | D+8.6 |
| Precinct -Goshen Twp-1Goshen Twp-1 | 70 | 207 | 8 | 285 | 24.6% | 72.6% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -Cane Hill-2Cane Hill-2 | 47 | 226 | 7 | 280 | 16.8% | 80.7% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 24Fay 24 | 227 | 40 | 11 | 278 | 81.7% | 14.4% | D+67.3 |
| Precinct -Johnson City-2Johnson City-2 | 85 | 177 | 4 | 266 | 32.0% | 66.5% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr Twp-3Prairie Gr Twp-3 | 85 | 173 | 7 | 265 | 32.1% | 65.3% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 44Fay 44 | 181 | 75 | 8 | 264 | 68.6% | 28.4% | D+40.2 |
| Precinct -Valley-3Valley-3 | 65 | 179 | 11 | 255 | 25.5% | 70.2% | R+44.7 |
| Precinct -Goshen Twp-2Goshen Twp-2 | 87 | 161 | 5 | 253 | 34.4% | 63.6% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -West Fork Twp-2West Fork Twp-2 | 91 | 147 | 9 | 247 | 36.8% | 59.5% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 33Fay 33 | 102 | 131 | 7 | 240 | 42.5% | 54.6% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -White River-1White River-1 | 70 | 154 | 4 | 228 | 30.7% | 67.5% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -WedingtonWedington | 47 | 169 | 5 | 221 | 21.3% | 76.5% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -Wheeler-2Wheeler-2 | 79 | 131 | 6 | 216 | 36.6% | 60.6% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -Greenland Twp-2Greenland Twp-2 | 84 | 122 | 8 | 214 | 39.3% | 57.0% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -West Fork City-2West Fork City-2 | 55 | 143 | 8 | 206 | 26.7% | 69.4% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -Morrow-1Morrow-1 | 46 | 146 | 4 | 196 | 23.5% | 74.5% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -Spg 41Spg 41 | 98 | 89 | 8 | 195 | 50.3% | 45.6% | D+4.6 |
| Precinct -Reed-1Reed-1 | 41 | 145 | 4 | 190 | 21.6% | 76.3% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -Spg 21Spg 21 | 76 | 99 | 7 | 182 | 41.8% | 54.4% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -Winslow CityWinslow City | 70 | 101 | 11 | 182 | 38.5% | 55.5% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -Johnson Twp-1Johnson Twp-1 | 91 | 84 | 4 | 179 | 50.8% | 46.9% | D+3.9 |
| Precinct -Spg 01Spg 01 | 76 | 94 | 6 | 176 | 43.2% | 53.4% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Elkins-2Elkins-2 | 54 | 112 | 6 | 172 | 31.4% | 65.1% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -Marrs Hill-2Marrs Hill-2 | 42 | 125 | 5 | 172 | 24.4% | 72.7% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -Spg 36Spg 36 | 72 | 94 | 4 | 170 | 42.4% | 55.3% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr City-3Prairie Gr City-3 | 40 | 127 | 1 | 168 | 23.8% | 75.6% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -BostonBoston | 38 | 123 | 1 | 162 | 23.5% | 75.9% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -Dutch MillsDutch Mills | 23 | 136 | 0 | 159 | 14.5% | 85.5% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -Spg 22Spg 22 | 46 | 109 | 3 | 158 | 29.1% | 69.0% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr Twp-1Prairie Gr Twp-1 | 20 | 129 | 4 | 153 | 13.1% | 84.3% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -Spg 24Spg 24 | 94 | 51 | 5 | 150 | 62.7% | 34.0% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -Fay 53Fay 53 | 44 | 90 | 5 | 139 | 31.7% | 64.7% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -Fay 41Fay 41 | 56 | 72 | 6 | 134 | 41.8% | 53.7% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -Spg 37Spg 37 | 49 | 79 | 1 | 129 | 38.0% | 61.2% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -Farmington-6Farmington-6 | 19 | 100 | 8 | 127 | 15.0% | 78.7% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -VineyardVineyard | 18 | 108 | 1 | 127 | 14.2% | 85.0% | R+70.9 |
| Precinct -Fay 37Fay 37 | 82 | 37 | 4 | 123 | 66.7% | 30.1% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -Litteral-1Litteral-1 | 37 | 76 | 3 | 116 | 31.9% | 65.5% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 4Prairie Twp 4 | 40 | 63 | 5 | 108 | 37.0% | 58.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -Spg 33Spg 33 | 50 | 50 | 2 | 102 | 49.0% | 49.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -Fay 63Fay 63 | 51 | 48 | 1 | 100 | 51.0% | 48.0% | D+3.0 |
| Precinct -Wheeler-5Wheeler-5 | 34 | 57 | 7 | 98 | 34.7% | 58.2% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -White River-2White River-2 | 23 | 66 | 0 | 89 | 25.8% | 74.2% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -War EagleWar Eagle | 20 | 64 | 4 | 88 | 22.7% | 72.7% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -Center-5Center-5 | 40 | 43 | 4 | 87 | 46.0% | 49.4% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -Spg 34Spg 34 | 45 | 38 | 4 | 87 | 51.7% | 43.7% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 16Fay 16 | 37 | 46 | 2 | 85 | 43.5% | 54.1% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -Fay 43Fay 43 | 29 | 54 | 1 | 84 | 34.5% | 64.3% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -White River-3White River-3 | 13 | 68 | 1 | 82 | 15.9% | 82.9% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -Spg 20Spg 20 | 41 | 33 | 2 | 76 | 53.9% | 43.4% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -Center-2Center-2 | 28 | 46 | 1 | 75 | 37.3% | 61.3% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -Greenland City-2Greenland City-2 | 35 | 33 | 3 | 71 | 49.3% | 46.5% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -Johnson Twp-3Johnson Twp-3 | 24 | 45 | 1 | 70 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -White River-5White River-5 | 14 | 53 | 2 | 69 | 20.3% | 76.8% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Tontitown City-3Tontitown City-3 | 10 | 53 | 4 | 67 | 14.9% | 79.1% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -Fay 55Fay 55 | 39 | 23 | 3 | 65 | 60.0% | 35.4% | D+24.6 |
| Precinct -Spg 32Spg 32 | 38 | 21 | 4 | 63 | 60.3% | 33.3% | D+27.0 |
| Precinct -Greenland Twp-3Greenland Twp-3 | 35 | 25 | 1 | 61 | 57.4% | 41.0% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -Harmon-3Harmon-3 | 23 | 37 | 1 | 61 | 37.7% | 60.7% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -Richland-2Richland-2 | 17 | 40 | 0 | 57 | 29.8% | 70.2% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -West Fork Twp-3West Fork Twp-3 | 22 | 33 | 1 | 56 | 39.3% | 58.9% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -Farmington-5Farmington-5 | 19 | 25 | 4 | 48 | 39.6% | 52.1% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -Spg 30Spg 30 | 14 | 29 | 2 | 45 | 31.1% | 64.4% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Reed-2Reed-2 | 6 | 36 | 0 | 42 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -Wheeler-3Wheeler-3 | 12 | 29 | 0 | 41 | 29.3% | 70.7% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -Fay 45Fay 45 | 14 | 24 | 0 | 38 | 36.8% | 63.2% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 64Fay 64 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 36 | 69.4% | 25.0% | D+44.4 |
| Precinct -Harmon-2Harmon-2 | 7 | 25 | 1 | 33 | 21.2% | 75.8% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -Tontitown TwpTontitown Twp | 11 | 21 | 1 | 33 | 33.3% | 63.6% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -Harmon-4Harmon-4 | 7 | 21 | 1 | 29 | 24.1% | 72.4% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 65Fay 65 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 28 | 78.6% | 21.4% | D+57.1 |
| Precinct -Center-4Center-4 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 25 | 36.0% | 64.0% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 51Fay 51 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -Cove Creek-3Cove Creek-3 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 36.8% | 57.9% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 3Prairie Twp 3 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 17 | 64.7% | 35.3% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 7Prairie Twp 7 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 52.9% | 47.1% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -Valley-2Valley-2 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 17.6% | 82.4% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -West Fork City-3West Fork City-3 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 76.5% | 17.6% | D+58.8 |
| Precinct -Litteral-4Litteral-4 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 87.5% | 12.5% | D+75.0 |
| Precinct -Richland-1Richland-1 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 38.5% | 53.8% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -Johnson Twp-4Johnson Twp-4 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Fay 57Fay 57 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 63.6% | 27.3% | D+36.4 |
| Precinct -Spg 23Spg 23 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Spg Twp-3Spg Twp-3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 20.0% | 80.0% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -Johnson City-4Johnson City-4 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 22.2% | 77.8% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -Morrow-2Morrow-2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Litteral-2Litteral-2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 12.5% | 87.5% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -Johnson Twp-2Johnson Twp-2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 83.3% | 16.7% | D+66.7 |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 6Prairie Twp 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -Center-3Center-3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 66Fay 66 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -Spg 38Spg 38 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 52Fay 52 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -Tontitown City-4Tontitown City-4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -White River-4White River-4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 60Fay 60 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Goshen City-2Goshen City-2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Prairie Gr City-5Prairie Gr City-5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Fay 48Fay 48 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Harmon-6Harmon-6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -Elm Springs TwpElm Springs Twp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Harmon-1Harmon-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Harmon-5Harmon-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 1Prairie Twp 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Prairie Twp 8Prairie Twp 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Washington County, AR · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
75.4%
4,971 votes · D+52.6
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · 72.2%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
70.9%
17,523 votes · R+42.2
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 68.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
43,824votes
46.5% of the vote · R+3.9
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 43,779 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
50,243votes
51.7% of the vote · R+6.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 47,504 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+51.3pts D vs U.S.
Place D+45.2 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · John W. Davis, 1924 · +45.1 pts
Republican
Richard Nixon1960
+30.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+30.0 · U.S. D+0.2
Runner-up · George H. W. Bush, 1988 · +22.4 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RJim PettyState Senate · 29
DGreg LedingState Senate · 30
RClint PenzoState Senate · 31
RJosh BryantState Senate · 32
RTyler DeesState Senate · 35
RRobin LundstrumState House · 18
RKendra MooreState House · 23
RBrad HallState House · 24
RChad PuryearState House · 25
Seats representing Washington County, AR. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 5 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 42.5%38,710 | 57.5%52,408 | 91,118 |
| 2020 | R | 44.4%39,890 | 55.6%50,007 | 89,897 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 133,455 |
| 2020 | 141,842 |
| 2022 | 143,380 |
| 2024 | 148,050 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,088 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +25,500 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,887 in average income, against $90,966 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+22.4 on average — 16 points more Republican-leaning than Washington County, AR itself (R+6.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Benton County, AR2,254R+27.0
- Pulaski County, AR327D+22.1
- Sebastian County, AR228R+37.5
- Madison County, AR196R+58.6
- Faulkner County, AR114R+32.3
- Carroll County, AR105R+31.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Benton County, AR2,548
- Madison County, AR240
- Pulaski County, AR156
- Sebastian County, AR150
- Dallas County, TX125
- Tulsa County, OK111
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1,270 |
| 2012 | +1,128 |
| 2013 | +2,154 |
| 2014 | +1,595 |
| 2015 | +2,196 |
| 2016 | +1,504 |
| 2017 | +2,155 |
| 2018 | +1,886 |
| 2019 | +802 |
| 2021 | +3,652 |
| 2022 | +2,805 |
| 2023 | +1,890 |
| 2024 | +1,375 |
| 2025 | +1,088 |
Washington County's large university-town population keeps its presidential margins closer than most of Arkansas, swinging between single-digit Republican advantages and occasional Democratic competitiveness over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 52.6 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 42.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 6.7 points.
A population of 256,765, a 60% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,639 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Tulsa County and Oklahoma County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Tulsa County
Oklahoma
87.0twin score
12-yr trendpopulation scalecollege share
Oklahoma County
Oklahoma
85.1twin score
12-yr trend2016–2024 trajectory≠ elasticity
Cleveland County
Oklahoma
82.2twin score
12-yr trendpopulation scalecollege share
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Washington County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05143/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Arkansas at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Washington County, Arkansas vote in 2024?
In 2024, Washington County, Arkansas voted Republican by 6.7 points (R+6.7), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 97,158 votes cast, 43,779 went Democratic and 50,243 went Republican.
When did Washington County, Arkansas last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Washington County, Arkansas voted Democratic was 1996.
How many people live in Washington County, Arkansas?
Washington County, Arkansas has a population of 256,765 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Washington County, Arkansas?
Median household income in Washington County, Arkansas is $70,639 — below the national median of $80,734. The Arkansas state median is $60,773.
What is the political history of Washington County, Arkansas?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Washington County, Arkansas from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 18 went Democratic and 16 went Republican.