Kings County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
100 precincts · 41,151 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -13051305 | 1,073 | 2,087 | 78 | 3,238 | 33.1% | 64.5% | R+31.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -12101210 | 1,332 | 1,395 | 67 | 2,794 | 47.7% | 49.9% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -15121512 | 1,056 | 1,546 | 59 | 2,661 | 39.7% | 58.1% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -14061406 | 615 | 843 | 24 | 1,482 | 41.5% | 56.9% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -13031303 | 270 | 1,137 | 20 | 1,427 | 18.9% | 79.7% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -11101110 | 491 | 834 | 27 | 1,352 | 36.3% | 61.7% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -14111411 | 464 | 622 | 24 | 1,110 | 41.8% | 56.0% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -13121312 | 373 | 654 | 28 | 1,055 | 35.4% | 62.0% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -11031103 | 464 | 561 | 25 | 1,050 | 44.2% | 53.4% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -11061106 | 384 | 619 | 24 | 1,027 | 37.4% | 60.3% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -15011501 | 353 | 632 | 21 | 1,006 | 35.1% | 62.8% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -15071507 | 337 | 643 | 23 | 1,003 | 33.6% | 64.1% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -13081308 | 346 | 634 | 14 | 994 | 34.8% | 63.8% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -13101310 | 352 | 567 | 15 | 934 | 37.7% | 60.7% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -13011301 | 330 | 586 | 16 | 932 | 35.4% | 62.9% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -13061306 | 282 | 519 | 11 | 812 | 34.7% | 63.9% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -15081508 | 243 | 493 | 11 | 747 | 32.5% | 66.0% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -14131413 | 311 | 366 | 26 | 703 | 44.2% | 52.1% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -15051505 | 214 | 463 | 16 | 693 | 30.9% | 66.8% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -11111111 | 266 | 413 | 12 | 691 | 38.5% | 59.8% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -14031403 | 321 | 303 | 24 | 648 | 49.5% | 46.8% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -13111311 | 204 | 371 | 11 | 586 | 34.8% | 63.3% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -11141114 | 225 | 321 | 14 | 560 | 40.2% | 57.3% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -14191419 | 212 | 283 | 7 | 502 | 42.2% | 56.4% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -14161416 | 268 | 198 | 15 | 481 | 55.7% | 41.2% | D+14.6 |
| Precinct -11051105 | 152 | 292 | 15 | 459 | 33.1% | 63.6% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -15141514 | 187 | 254 | 11 | 452 | 41.4% | 56.2% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -11011101 | 156 | 279 | 11 | 446 | 35.0% | 62.6% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -13151315 | 103 | 336 | 5 | 444 | 23.2% | 75.7% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -12121212 | 211 | 212 | 8 | 431 | 49.0% | 49.2% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -15061506 | 121 | 279 | 9 | 409 | 29.6% | 68.2% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -14181418 | 199 | 201 | 7 | 407 | 48.9% | 49.4% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -12231223 | 174 | 199 | 9 | 382 | 45.5% | 52.1% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -14121412 | 125 | 229 | 11 | 365 | 34.2% | 62.7% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -14261426 | 129 | 229 | 7 | 365 | 35.3% | 62.7% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -15021502 | 107 | 243 | 7 | 357 | 30.0% | 68.1% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -11181118 | 159 | 165 | 6 | 330 | 48.2% | 50.0% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -12041204 | 206 | 109 | 8 | 323 | 63.8% | 33.7% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -14171417 | 185 | 121 | 11 | 317 | 58.4% | 38.2% | D+20.2 |
| Precinct -15251525 | 52 | 260 | 1 | 313 | 16.6% | 83.1% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -15241524 | 44 | 260 | 5 | 309 | 14.2% | 84.1% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -11021102 | 112 | 191 | 5 | 308 | 36.4% | 62.0% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -14051405 | 134 | 160 | 6 | 300 | 44.7% | 53.3% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -11071107 | 125 | 166 | 8 | 299 | 41.8% | 55.5% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -12131213 | 152 | 131 | 11 | 294 | 51.7% | 44.6% | D+7.1 |
| Precinct -15151515 | 153 | 131 | 8 | 292 | 52.4% | 44.9% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -13091309 | 93 | 183 | 7 | 283 | 32.9% | 64.7% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -12091209 | 84 | 171 | 4 | 259 | 32.4% | 66.0% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -15041504 | 64 | 188 | 5 | 257 | 24.9% | 73.2% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -15171517 | 108 | 135 | 5 | 248 | 43.5% | 54.4% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -12151215 | 93 | 120 | 11 | 224 | 41.5% | 53.6% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -15131513 | 119 | 91 | 5 | 215 | 55.3% | 42.3% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -15031503 | 45 | 146 | 1 | 192 | 23.4% | 76.0% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -13131313 | 63 | 116 | 10 | 189 | 33.3% | 61.4% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -15261526 | 45 | 133 | 3 | 181 | 24.9% | 73.5% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -15201520 | 23 | 147 | 3 | 173 | 13.3% | 85.0% | R+71.7 |
| Precinct -12181218 | 36 | 129 | 2 | 167 | 21.6% | 77.2% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -11161116 | 35 | 118 | 4 | 157 | 22.3% | 75.2% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -11171117 | 71 | 83 | 1 | 155 | 45.8% | 53.5% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -15111511 | 45 | 100 | 5 | 150 | 30.0% | 66.7% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -11131113 | 39 | 105 | 0 | 144 | 27.1% | 72.9% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -12261226 | 74 | 68 | 2 | 144 | 51.4% | 47.2% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -15281528 | 52 | 87 | 5 | 144 | 36.1% | 60.4% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -15291529 | 36 | 97 | 3 | 136 | 26.5% | 71.3% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -13021302 | 49 | 67 | 6 | 122 | 40.2% | 54.9% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -15091509 | 34 | 86 | 1 | 121 | 28.1% | 71.1% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -13221322 | 14 | 101 | 2 | 117 | 12.0% | 86.3% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -14141414 | 35 | 65 | 2 | 102 | 34.3% | 63.7% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -13071307 | 38 | 51 | 0 | 89 | 42.7% | 57.3% | R+14.6 |
| Precinct -12241224 | 13 | 67 | 4 | 84 | 15.5% | 79.8% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -15191519 | 9 | 69 | 1 | 79 | 11.4% | 87.3% | R+75.9 |
| Precinct -15211521 | 9 | 64 | 2 | 75 | 12.0% | 85.3% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -11041104 | 38 | 30 | 1 | 69 | 55.1% | 43.5% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -15301530 | 18 | 48 | 1 | 67 | 26.9% | 71.6% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -12161216 | 32 | 27 | 1 | 60 | 53.3% | 45.0% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -14281428 | 20 | 29 | 0 | 49 | 40.8% | 59.2% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -12111211 | 13 | 32 | 3 | 48 | 27.1% | 66.7% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -13201320 | 21 | 22 | 5 | 48 | 43.8% | 45.8% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -13141314 | 2 | 42 | 1 | 45 | 4.4% | 93.3% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -14221422 | 18 | 21 | 0 | 39 | 46.2% | 53.8% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -13231323 | 13 | 22 | 0 | 35 | 37.1% | 62.9% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -14041404 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 34 | 5.9% | 94.1% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -14251425 | 7 | 27 | 0 | 34 | 20.6% | 79.4% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -13161316 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 29 | 31.0% | 65.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -13211321 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 29 | 3.4% | 96.6% | R+93.1 |
| Precinct -12171217 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 26 | 42.3% | 46.2% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -13171317 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 26 | 11.5% | 88.5% | R+76.9 |
| Precinct -11121112 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 24 | 41.7% | 58.3% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -14231423 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 24 | 41.7% | 58.3% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -15101510 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 22 | 27.3% | 72.7% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -15231523 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 19 | 31.6% | 57.9% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -12011201 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 18 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -11091109 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 31.3% | 68.8% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -12221222 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 16 | 18.8% | 81.3% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -14101410 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 16 | 18.8% | 75.0% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -14011401 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -14071407 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 53.8% | 46.2% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -14021402 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 8.3% | 91.7% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -12021202 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 27.3% | 54.5% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct -14211421 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 18.2% | 81.8% | R+63.6 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +12.1% |
| 1900 | −8.0% |
| 1904 | −27.2% |
| 1908 | −15.1% |
| 1912 | +49.8% |
| 1916 | +12.2% |
| 1920 | −25.5% |
| 1924 | −30.3% |
| 1928 | −4.3% |
| 1932 | +42.3% |
| 1936 | +51.4% |
| 1940 | +35.7% |
| 1944 | +30.8% |
| 1948 | +22.7% |
| 1952 | +2.0% |
| 1956 | +15.2% |
| 1960 | +14.8% |
| 1964 | +38.9% |
| 1968 | +4.7% |
| 1972 | −17.4% |
| 1976 | −1.2% |
| 1980 | −17.0% |
| 1984 | −29.0% |
| 1988 | −13.9% |
| 1992 | −2.7% |
| 1996 | −4.3% |
| 2000 | −18.8% |
| 2004 | −31.7% |
| 2008 | −14.1% |
| 2012 | −14.9% |
| 2016 | −13.0% |
| 2020 | −12.3% |
| 2024 | −23.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 16 points more Democratic.
63,512 registered voters · 2024 · up from 61,176 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−1,082 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −19,515 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,366 in average income, against $64,143 for residents who stayed — 21% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+0.3 on average — 23 points more Democratic-leaning than Kings County, CA itself (R+23.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Fresno County, CA612R+4.4
- Tulare County, CA398R+20.7
- Los Angeles County, CA136D+32.9
- San Diego County, CA136D+16.8
- Kern County, CA92R+21.1
- Virginia Beach city, VA63D+2.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Fresno County, CA498
- Tulare County, CA445
- San Diego County, CA176
- Los Angeles County, CA112
- Kern County, CA90
- Virginia Beach city, VA64
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −2,315 |
| 2012 | −2,798 |
| 2013 | −2,509 |
| 2014 | −2,530 |
| 2015 | −1,194 |
| 2016 | −2,327 |
| 2017 | −1,183 |
| 2018 | +423 |
| 2019 | +197 |
| 2021 | −1,007 |
| 2022 | −1,122 |
| 2023 | −1,076 |
| 2024 | −992 |
| 2025 | −1,082 |
Kings County's economy revolves around cotton, dairy, and commodity crops, and its largely rural, Latino and white working-class electorate has shifted decisively rightward over the past decade, producing double-digit Republican margins in recent presidential cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 51.4 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 31.7 points in 2004. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 10.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 23.0 points.
A population of 153,298, a 28% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,995 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Tulare County and Madera County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Kings County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06031/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.