- Lead
- 8,726
- Total
- 50,706
- vs nation
- R+15.7
- Turnout
- 64.2%
Navajo County, AZ
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.2% of 80,006 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,274
- Total
- 51,930
- vs nation
- R+12.7
- Turnout
- 65.8%
- Lead
- 4,118
- Total
- 40,294
- vs nation
- R+12.3
- Turnout
- 55.5%
- Lead
- 2,939
- Total
- 37,465
- vs nation
- R+11.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,182
- Total
- 35,800
- vs nation
- R+19.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,462
- Total
- 32,404
- vs nation
- R+5.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 592
- Total
- 25,147
- vs nation
- R+2.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,650
- Total
- 24,938
- vs nation
- D+6.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+17.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 108,4152024 5-year
- Population density
- 11 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 9,950 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $54,6062024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 42.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 10.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+47.9 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+33.6 in 1980MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Apache County, AZ · twin score 82.1
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 64.2%51,386 participants ÷ 80,006 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.6 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -3.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 50.7%–53.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51,386 | 80,006 ± 463 | 64.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 40,974 | 78,419 ± 542 | 52.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 52,490 | 79,742 ± 502 | 65.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 37,172 | 77,554 ± 430 | 47.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 42,325 | 76,282 ± 404 | 55.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 37,465 | 73,612 | 50.9% | Derived | — | |
| 35,800 | 73,976 | 48.4% | Derived | — | |
| 32,404 | 74,340 extrapolated | 43.6% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 71 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
71 precincts · 50,847 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -BisonBison | 2,072 | 7,209 | 86 | 9,367 | 22.1% | 77.0% | R+54.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PioneerPioneer | 1,110 | 7,168 | 90 | 8,368 | 13.3% | 85.7% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -WoodlandWoodland | 1,797 | 4,244 | 80 | 6,121 | 29.4% | 69.3% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -Red ButteRed Butte | 4,305 | 1,128 | 93 | 5,526 | 77.9% | 20.4% | D+57.5 |
| Precinct -Cedar ValleyCedar Valley | 2,091 | 1,362 | 48 | 3,501 | 59.7% | 38.9% | D+20.8 |
| Precinct -Black ButtesBlack Buttes | 2,503 | 591 | 40 | 3,134 | 79.9% | 18.9% | D+61.0 |
| Precinct -HubbellHubbell | 1,624 | 1,352 | 43 | 3,019 | 53.8% | 44.8% | D+9.0 |
| Precinct -SunriseSunrise | 2,397 | 585 | 25 | 3,007 | 79.7% | 19.5% | D+60.3 |
| Precinct -MogollonMogollon | 542 | 1,955 | 17 | 2,514 | 21.6% | 77.8% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -JuniperJuniper | 386 | 1,810 | 24 | 2,220 | 17.4% | 81.5% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -Stone ButteStone Butte | 1,172 | 226 | 24 | 1,422 | 82.4% | 15.9% | D+66.5 |
| Precinct -SitgreavesSitgreaves | 281 | 954 | 20 | 1,255 | 22.4% | 76.0% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -Painted DesertPainted Desert | 389 | 592 | 17 | 998 | 39.0% | 59.3% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -AntelopeAntelope | 50 | 223 | 5 | 278 | 18.0% | 80.2% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -ElkElk | 33 | 59 | 1 | 93 | 35.5% | 63.4% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -MaverikMaverik | 1 | 17 | 0 | 18 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -Wild HorseWild Horse | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Birdsprings Voting District04_0401751 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Black Mesa Voting District04_0401757 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cedar Hills Voting District04_0401759 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Chilchinbeto Voting District04_0401701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cibecue Voting District04_0401702 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clay Springs/Pinedale Voting District04_040173 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dilkon Voting District04_0401704 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake Voting District04_0401764 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Greasewood Voting District04_0401706 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hard Rocks 3 Voting District04_0401776 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Heber/Overgaard Voting District04_040178 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Holbrook 1 Voting District04_040179 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Holbrook 2 Voting District04_0401711 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Holbrook 3 Voting District04_0401710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hondah Voting District04_0401756 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Indian Wells Voting District04_0401713 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Jeddito 1 Voting District04_0401715 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Joseph City Voting District04_0401716 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kayenta 1 Voting District04_0401717 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kayenta 2 Voting District04_0401718 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Keams Canyon Voting District04_0401719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lakeside 1 Voting District04_0401720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lakeside 2 Voting District04_0401752 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Linden Voting District04_0401721 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Low Mountain 1 Voting District04_0401722 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oraibi Voting District04_0401724 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pinetop 1 Voting District04_0401728 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pinetop 2 Voting District04_0401753 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pinon 1 Voting District04_0401729 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Polacca Voting District04_0401730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Shonto Voting District04_0401731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Show Low 1 Voting District04_0401732 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Show Low 2 Voting District04_0401733 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Show Low 3 Voting District04_0401754 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Show Low 4 Voting District04_0401762 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Snowflake 1 Voting District04_0401735 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Snowflake 2 Voting District04_0401736 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sun Valley Voting District04_0401758 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tachee/Blue Gap Voting District04_0401761 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Taylor 1 Voting District04_0401738 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Taylor 2 Voting District04_0401755 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Teesto Voting District04_0401769 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Toreva Voting District04_0401740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whippoorwill/Springs 1 Voting District04_0401760 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Mnt Lake Voting District04_0401763 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White River 2 Voting District04_0401779 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whitecone 2 Voting District04_0401777 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whiteriver 1 Voting District04_0401742 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winslow 1 Voting District04_0401743 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winslow 2 Voting District04_0401744 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winslow 3 Voting District04_0401745 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winslow 4 Voting District04_0401746 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winslow 5 Voting District04_0401747 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodruff Voting District04_0401750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Navajo County, AZ · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1912–2024 · 29 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
73.3%
3,037 votes · D+47.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · 66.4%
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1956
65.8%
3,928 votes · R+31.7
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1980 · 63.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
23,383votes
45.0% of the vote · R+8.2
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 20,754 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
29,480votes
58.1% of the vote · R+17.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 27,657 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
+32.3pts D vs U.S.
Place D+35.4 · U.S. D+3.1
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +24.0 pts
Republican
Ronald Reagan1980
+23.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+33.6 · U.S. R+9.7
Runner-up · Barry Goldwater, 1964 · +23.6 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Navajo County, AZ. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 9.5 points more Republican than the rolls.
72,918 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+396 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,993 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $60,422 in average income, against $58,365 for residents who stayed — 4% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.5 on average — 17 points more Democratic-leaning than Navajo County, AZ itself (R+17.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Maricopa County, AZ1,017R+3.5
- Coconino County, AZ199D+19.9
- Apache County, AZ187D+19.0
- Pinal County, AZ144R+22.1
- Pima County, AZ138D+15.2
- Gila County, AZ53R+37.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Maricopa County, AZ870
- Coconino County, AZ193
- Apache County, AZ162
- Pima County, AZ143
- Pinal County, AZ130
- Yavapai County, AZ50
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,030 |
| 2012 | −982 |
| 2013 | −876 |
| 2014 | −144 |
| 2015 | −747 |
| 2016 | +202 |
| 2017 | +82 |
| 2018 | +813 |
| 2019 | +311 |
| 2021 | +1,462 |
| 2022 | +1,480 |
| 2023 | +699 |
| 2024 | +327 |
| 2025 | +396 |
Navajo County spans nearly 10,000 square miles of plateau and canyon country, with the Navajo and Hopi nations covering much of its interior. That reservation geography drives turnout patterns and ballot-access logistics unlike almost any other Arizona county.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 47.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 33.6 points in 1980. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 9.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 17.2 points.
A population of 108,415, a 43% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $54,606 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Apache County and Cherokee County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Navajo County, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/04017/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.