Garland County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
52 precincts · 42,327 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -092092 | 721 | 1,598 | 37 | 2,356 | 30.6% | 67.8% | R+37.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -094094 | 497 | 1,266 | 42 | 1,805 | 27.5% | 70.1% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -133133 | 434 | 1,286 | 35 | 1,755 | 24.7% | 73.3% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -082082 | 309 | 1,134 | 27 | 1,470 | 21.0% | 77.1% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -074074 | 361 | 1,052 | 26 | 1,439 | 25.1% | 73.1% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -011011 | 761 | 580 | 54 | 1,395 | 54.6% | 41.6% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -062062 | 440 | 905 | 32 | 1,377 | 32.0% | 65.7% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -054054 | 433 | 905 | 34 | 1,372 | 31.6% | 66.0% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -044044 | 515 | 805 | 32 | 1,352 | 38.1% | 59.5% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -113113 | 373 | 900 | 28 | 1,301 | 28.7% | 69.2% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -091091 | 328 | 889 | 22 | 1,239 | 26.5% | 71.8% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -061061 | 385 | 790 | 36 | 1,211 | 31.8% | 65.2% | R+33.4 |
| Precinct -132132 | 470 | 631 | 35 | 1,136 | 41.4% | 55.5% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -101101 | 188 | 933 | 12 | 1,133 | 16.6% | 82.3% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -071071 | 299 | 808 | 25 | 1,132 | 26.4% | 71.4% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -073073 | 312 | 792 | 23 | 1,127 | 27.7% | 70.3% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -103103 | 326 | 772 | 28 | 1,126 | 29.0% | 68.6% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -053053 | 443 | 645 | 23 | 1,111 | 39.9% | 58.1% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -131131 | 214 | 852 | 26 | 1,092 | 19.6% | 78.0% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -041041 | 492 | 544 | 31 | 1,067 | 46.1% | 51.0% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -063063 | 330 | 668 | 26 | 1,024 | 32.2% | 65.2% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -032032 | 416 | 574 | 24 | 1,014 | 41.0% | 56.6% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -122122 | 215 | 774 | 22 | 1,011 | 21.3% | 76.6% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -121121 | 206 | 781 | 18 | 1,005 | 20.5% | 77.7% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -084084 | 221 | 737 | 20 | 978 | 22.6% | 75.4% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -042042 | 281 | 557 | 18 | 856 | 32.8% | 65.1% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -031031 | 420 | 379 | 25 | 824 | 51.0% | 46.0% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -021021 | 460 | 323 | 27 | 810 | 56.8% | 39.9% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -022022 | 165 | 498 | 12 | 675 | 24.4% | 73.8% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -051051 | 264 | 369 | 25 | 658 | 40.1% | 56.1% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -102102 | 119 | 508 | 12 | 639 | 18.6% | 79.5% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -083083 | 143 | 476 | 15 | 634 | 22.6% | 75.1% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -012012 | 121 | 466 | 7 | 594 | 20.4% | 78.5% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -134134 | 109 | 399 | 12 | 520 | 21.0% | 76.7% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -114114 | 173 | 284 | 6 | 463 | 37.4% | 61.3% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -081081 | 81 | 318 | 12 | 411 | 19.7% | 77.4% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -093093 | 92 | 259 | 7 | 358 | 25.7% | 72.3% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -112112 | 43 | 300 | 3 | 346 | 12.4% | 86.7% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -013013 | 114 | 219 | 9 | 342 | 33.3% | 64.0% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -014014 | 75 | 243 | 9 | 327 | 22.9% | 74.3% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -123123 | 89 | 184 | 1 | 274 | 32.5% | 67.2% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -034034 | 128 | 128 | 4 | 260 | 49.2% | 49.2% | Even |
| Precinct -033033 | 83 | 154 | 7 | 244 | 34.0% | 63.1% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -072072 | 56 | 145 | 6 | 207 | 27.1% | 70.0% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -124124 | 87 | 108 | 5 | 200 | 43.5% | 54.0% | R+10.5 |
| Precinct -023023 | 44 | 140 | 5 | 189 | 23.3% | 74.1% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -043043 | 53 | 80 | 4 | 137 | 38.7% | 58.4% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -024024 | 75 | 45 | 3 | 123 | 61.0% | 36.6% | D+24.4 |
| Precinct -104104 | 22 | 100 | 0 | 122 | 18.0% | 82.0% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -064064 | 18 | 27 | 0 | 45 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -111111 | 9 | 26 | 0 | 35 | 25.7% | 74.3% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -052052 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 33.3% | 50.0% | R+16.7 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +20.4% |
| 1896 | +34.0% |
| 1900 | +14.0% |
| 1904 | −3.0% |
| 1908 | +9.1% |
| 1912 | +36.8% |
| 1916 | +22.7% |
| 1920 | +21.2% |
| 1924 | +15.4% |
| 1928 | +1.9% |
| 1932 | +67.2% |
| 1936 | +41.0% |
| 1940 | +40.0% |
| 1944 | +26.9% |
| 1948 | +20.7% |
| 1952 | −20.5% |
| 1956 | −26.5% |
| 1960 | −6.2% |
| 1964 | +7.6% |
| 1968 | −10.0% |
| 1972 | −49.2% |
| 1976 | +20.3% |
| 1980 | −10.8% |
| 1984 | −28.7% |
| 1988 | −24.9% |
| 1992 | +16.5% |
| 1996 | +15.3% |
| 2000 | −9.1% |
| 2004 | −9.2% |
| 2008 | −25.0% |
| 2012 | −30.0% |
| 2016 | −35.0% |
| 2020 | −34.0% |
| 2024 | −36.3% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 27.8%9,162 | 68.6%22,606 | 32,954 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 69.5%30,420 | 43,756 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 65,899 |
| 2020 | 66,198 |
| 2022 | 65,049 |
| 2024 | 63,951 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+380 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +8,154 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,962 in average income, against $76,385 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.6 on average — 11 points more Democratic-leaning than Garland County, AR itself (R+36.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Saline County, AR236R+40.1
- Hot Spring County, AR216R+52.2
- Pulaski County, AR178D+22.1
- Clark County, AR64R+20.5
- Tarrant County, TX46R+5.1
- Faulkner County, AR44R+32.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Saline County, AR356
- Hot Spring County, AR238
- Pulaski County, AR216
- Washington County, AR75
- Clark County, AR70
- Faulkner County, AR52
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +980 |
| 2012 | +428 |
| 2013 | +965 |
| 2014 | +349 |
| 2015 | +319 |
| 2016 | +693 |
| 2017 | +366 |
| 2018 | +971 |
| 2019 | +726 |
| 2021 | +705 |
| 2022 | +379 |
| 2023 | +338 |
| 2024 | +555 |
| 2025 | +380 |
Garland County's resort-city core around Hot Springs gives it more tourism-driven economic diversity than many Arkansas counties, yet it has posted Republican presidential margins above 30 points in recent cycles, reflecting the broader rightward tilt of non-metropolitan Arkansas.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 67.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 49.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 36.3 points.
A population of 100,035, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $57,181 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Conway County and Hot Spring County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Garland County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.