Logan County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
36 precincts · 8,205 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -137 - Boone WD 4137 - Boone WD 4 | 100 | 588 | 17 | 705 | 14.2% | 83.4% | R+69.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -117 - Sht Mtn WD 4117 - Sht Mtn WD 4 | 118 | 438 | 10 | 566 | 20.8% | 77.4% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -114 - Sht Mtn WD 1114 - Sht Mtn WD 1 | 120 | 360 | 13 | 493 | 24.3% | 73.0% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -136 - Boone WD 3136 - Boone WD 3 | 93 | 346 | 7 | 446 | 20.9% | 77.6% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -115 - Sht Mtn WD 2115 - Sht Mtn WD 2 | 84 | 314 | 7 | 405 | 20.7% | 77.5% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -135 - Boone WD 2135 - Boone WD 2 | 79 | 310 | 10 | 399 | 19.8% | 77.7% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -113 - Shoal Creek113 - Shoal Creek | 68 | 277 | 7 | 352 | 19.3% | 78.7% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -145 - Washburn145 - Washburn | 49 | 278 | 10 | 337 | 14.5% | 82.5% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -134 - Boone WD 1134 - Boone WD 1 | 53 | 274 | 7 | 334 | 15.9% | 82.0% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -106 - Ellsworth106 - Ellsworth | 37 | 270 | 6 | 313 | 11.8% | 86.3% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -116 - Sht Mtn WD 3116 - Sht Mtn WD 3 | 63 | 209 | 6 | 278 | 22.7% | 75.2% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -104 - Delaware104 - Delaware | 46 | 218 | 9 | 273 | 16.8% | 79.9% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -141 - Reveille Rural141 - Reveille Rural | 42 | 218 | 7 | 267 | 15.7% | 81.6% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -140 - Reveille City140 - Reveille City | 40 | 196 | 1 | 237 | 16.9% | 82.7% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -100 - Cane Creek100 - Cane Creek | 41 | 176 | 5 | 222 | 18.5% | 79.3% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -105 - Driggs105 - Driggs | 19 | 196 | 4 | 219 | 8.7% | 89.5% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -144 - Sugar Creek144 - Sugar Creek | 22 | 182 | 3 | 207 | 10.6% | 87.9% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -108 - Logan108 - Logan | 35 | 164 | 3 | 202 | 17.3% | 81.2% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -119 - Caulksville Rural119 - Caulksville Rural | 29 | 150 | 8 | 187 | 15.5% | 80.2% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -102 - Clark City102 - Clark City | 39 | 124 | 6 | 169 | 23.1% | 73.4% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -146 - Barber146 - Barber | 19 | 144 | 1 | 164 | 11.6% | 87.8% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -101 - Clark Crossroads101 - Clark Crossroads | 29 | 128 | 5 | 162 | 17.9% | 79.0% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -111 - River Rural111 - River Rural | 46 | 92 | 7 | 145 | 31.7% | 63.4% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -138 - Cauthron138 - Cauthron | 19 | 119 | 3 | 141 | 13.5% | 84.4% | R+70.9 |
| Precinct -147 - Tomlinson147 - Tomlinson | 19 | 110 | 1 | 130 | 14.6% | 84.6% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -103 - Clark Rural103 - Clark Rural | 24 | 98 | 1 | 123 | 19.5% | 79.7% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct -139 - Petit Jean139 - Petit Jean | 18 | 90 | 2 | 110 | 16.4% | 81.8% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -107 - Johnson107 - Johnson | 12 | 97 | 0 | 109 | 11.0% | 89.0% | R+78.0 |
| Precinct -118 - Caulksville City118 - Caulksville City | 17 | 85 | 3 | 105 | 16.2% | 81.0% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -110 - River City110 - River City | 19 | 67 | 1 | 87 | 21.8% | 77.0% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -109 - Mountain109 - Mountain | 11 | 63 | 0 | 74 | 14.9% | 85.1% | R+70.3 |
| Precinct -121 - Ratcliff Rural121 - Ratcliff Rural | 21 | 45 | 3 | 69 | 30.4% | 65.2% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -120 - Ratcliff City120 - Ratcliff City | 14 | 54 | 0 | 68 | 20.6% | 79.4% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -122 - Morrison Bluff122 - Morrison Bluff | 11 | 30 | 0 | 41 | 26.8% | 73.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -132 - Blue Mountain City132 - Blue Mountain City | 4 | 33 | 1 | 38 | 10.5% | 86.8% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -133 - Blue Mountain Rural133 - Blue Mountain Rural | 4 | 24 | 0 | 28 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.4 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +19.6% |
| 1896 | +30.6% |
| 1900 | +29.2% |
| 1904 | +10.0% |
| 1908 | +19.0% |
| 1912 | +38.4% |
| 1916 | +26.1% |
| 1920 | −0.8% |
| 1924 | +17.8% |
| 1928 | +14.9% |
| 1932 | +58.2% |
| 1936 | +55.0% |
| 1940 | +45.3% |
| 1944 | +27.8% |
| 1948 | +38.5% |
| 1952 | +9.9% |
| 1956 | +5.1% |
| 1960 | +13.1% |
| 1964 | +22.7% |
| 1968 | −5.3% |
| 1972 | −43.3% |
| 1976 | +29.0% |
| 1980 | −4.6% |
| 1984 | −27.4% |
| 1988 | −27.1% |
| 1992 | +6.8% |
| 1996 | +10.8% |
| 2000 | −14.9% |
| 2004 | −20.1% |
| 2008 | −38.8% |
| 2012 | −41.9% |
| 2016 | −52.7% |
| 2020 | −59.5% |
| 2024 | −62.2% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 17.6%1,094 | 79.0%4,920 | 6,228 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 79.8%6,524 | 8,178 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 12,288 |
| 2020 | 12,214 |
| 2022 | 13,088 |
| 2024 | 14,136 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+195 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +193 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $43,452 in average income, against $53,299 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+49.5 on average — 13 points more Democratic-leaning than Logan County, AR itself (R+62.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sebastian County, AR91R+37.5
- Franklin County, AR36R+62.4
- Johnson County, AR32R+51.4
- Yell County, AR27R+60.7
- Pope County, AR23R+52.2
- Crawford County, AR22R+58.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sebastian County, AR99
- Franklin County, AR54
- Johnson County, AR35
- Pope County, AR33
- Crawford County, AR31
- Yell County, AR23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −60 |
| 2012 | −353 |
| 2013 | +80 |
| 2014 | −132 |
| 2015 | −162 |
| 2016 | −18 |
| 2017 | −7 |
| 2018 | −19 |
| 2019 | −156 |
| 2021 | +218 |
| 2022 | +142 |
| 2023 | +234 |
| 2024 | +231 |
| 2025 | +195 |
Logan County, nestled in the Arkansas River Valley between the Ouachita and Ozark uplifts, recorded an R+62.2 presidential margin in 2024—among the widest in a state already dominated by Republican-leaning rural counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 58.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 62.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 62.2 points.
A population of 21,277, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,555 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of McNairy County and Independence County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Logan County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05083/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.