Lonoke County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
55 precincts · 30,620 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -06 - Cabot City Ward 206 - Cabot City Ward 2 | 807 | 2,781 | 58 | 3,646 | 22.1% | 76.3% | R+54.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -07 - Cabot City Ward 307 - Cabot City Ward 3 | 627 | 1,944 | 56 | 2,627 | 23.9% | 74.0% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -08 - Cabot City Ward 408 - Cabot City Ward 4 | 567 | 1,792 | 51 | 2,410 | 23.5% | 74.4% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -40 - Oak Grove TWP40 - Oak Grove TWP | 361 | 1,837 | 51 | 2,249 | 16.1% | 81.7% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -05 - Cabot City Ward 105 - Cabot City Ward 1 | 509 | 1,407 | 52 | 1,968 | 25.9% | 71.5% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct -03 - Austin City03 - Austin City | 251 | 1,064 | 33 | 1,348 | 18.6% | 78.9% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -04 - Butler TWP04 - Butler TWP | 184 | 1,081 | 18 | 1,283 | 14.3% | 84.3% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -23 - Goodrum TWP23 - Goodrum TWP | 192 | 1,037 | 20 | 1,249 | 15.4% | 83.0% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -02 - Caroline TWP02 - Caroline TWP | 210 | 975 | 26 | 1,211 | 17.3% | 80.5% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -16 - Eagle TWP16 - Eagle TWP | 153 | 980 | 19 | 1,152 | 13.3% | 85.1% | R+71.8 |
| Precinct -24 - Gray TWP24 - Gray TWP | 284 | 796 | 19 | 1,099 | 25.8% | 72.4% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -39 - Magness TWP39 - Magness TWP | 162 | 840 | 27 | 1,029 | 15.7% | 81.6% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -49 - Ward City Ward 349 - Ward City Ward 3 | 147 | 604 | 17 | 768 | 19.1% | 78.6% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -48 - Ward City Ward 248 - Ward City Ward 2 | 135 | 579 | 17 | 731 | 18.5% | 79.2% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -47 - Ward City Ward 147 - Ward City Ward 1 | 140 | 544 | 13 | 697 | 20.1% | 78.0% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -09 - York TWP09 - York TWP | 119 | 448 | 11 | 578 | 20.6% | 77.5% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -50 - Ward TWP50 - Ward TWP | 85 | 452 | 10 | 547 | 15.5% | 82.6% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -10 - Carlisle City Ward 110 - Carlisle City Ward 1 | 88 | 349 | 11 | 448 | 19.6% | 77.9% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -38 - Lonoke TWP38 - Lonoke TWP | 100 | 294 | 6 | 400 | 25.0% | 73.5% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -22 - Furlow TWP22 - Furlow TWP | 103 | 266 | 8 | 377 | 27.3% | 70.6% | R+43.2 |
| Precinct -51 - Williams TWP51 - Williams TWP | 107 | 174 | 3 | 284 | 37.7% | 61.3% | R+23.6 |
| Precinct -56 - Lonoke City Ward 856 - Lonoke City Ward 8 | 82 | 195 | 3 | 280 | 29.3% | 69.6% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -17 - England City Ward 117 - England City Ward 1 | 50 | 213 | 9 | 272 | 18.4% | 78.3% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -12 - Carlisle City Ward 312 - Carlisle City Ward 3 | 63 | 192 | 3 | 258 | 24.4% | 74.4% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -42 - Prairie TWP42 - Prairie TWP | 37 | 185 | 3 | 225 | 16.4% | 82.2% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -20 - England City Ward 420 - England City Ward 4 | 41 | 171 | 3 | 215 | 19.1% | 79.5% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -35 - Lonoke City Ward 235 - Lonoke City Ward 2 | 54 | 156 | 4 | 214 | 25.2% | 72.9% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -55 - Lonoke City Ward 755 - Lonoke City Ward 7 | 79 | 122 | 2 | 203 | 38.9% | 60.1% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -19 - England City Ward 319 - England City Ward 3 | 162 | 33 | 2 | 197 | 82.2% | 16.8% | D+65.5 |
| Precinct -34 - Lonoke City Ward 134 - Lonoke City Ward 1 | 62 | 122 | 7 | 191 | 32.5% | 63.9% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -45 - Totten TWP45 - Totten TWP | 26 | 153 | 9 | 188 | 13.8% | 81.4% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -37 - Lonoke City Ward 437 - Lonoke City Ward 4 | 59 | 125 | 1 | 185 | 31.9% | 67.6% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -18 - England City Ward 218 - England City Ward 2 | 84 | 94 | 6 | 184 | 45.7% | 51.1% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -53 - Lonoke City Ward 553 - Lonoke City Ward 5 | 98 | 71 | 6 | 175 | 56.0% | 40.6% | D+15.4 |
| Precinct -54 - Lonoke City Ward 654 - Lonoke City Ward 6 | 127 | 44 | 1 | 172 | 73.8% | 25.6% | D+48.3 |
| Precinct -43 - Pulaski TWP43 - Pulaski TWP | 123 | 41 | 3 | 167 | 73.7% | 24.6% | D+49.1 |
| Precinct -13 - Carlisle TWP13 - Carlisle TWP | 11 | 144 | 4 | 159 | 6.9% | 90.6% | R+83.6 |
| Precinct -11 - Carlisle City Ward 211 - Carlisle City Ward 2 | 52 | 73 | 1 | 126 | 41.3% | 57.9% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -33 - Keo City33 - Keo City | 37 | 73 | 4 | 114 | 32.5% | 64.0% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -36 - Lonoke City Ward 336 - Lonoke City Ward 3 | 43 | 69 | 0 | 112 | 38.4% | 61.6% | R+23.2 |
| Precinct -28 - Humnoke City28 - Humnoke City | 6 | 102 | 0 | 108 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -14 - Cleveland TWP14 - Cleveland TWP | 27 | 80 | 0 | 107 | 25.2% | 74.8% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -27 - Crooked Creek TWP27 - Crooked Creek TWP | 11 | 93 | 2 | 106 | 10.4% | 87.7% | R+77.4 |
| Precinct -15 - Dortch TWP15 - Dortch TWP | 23 | 52 | 1 | 76 | 30.3% | 68.4% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -21 - Fletcher TWP21 - Fletcher TWP | 9 | 53 | 0 | 62 | 14.5% | 85.5% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -31 - Isbell TWP31 - Isbell TWP | 2 | 57 | 1 | 60 | 3.3% | 95.0% | R+91.7 |
| Precinct -25 - Gumwood TWP25 - Gumwood TWP | 14 | 45 | 0 | 59 | 23.7% | 76.3% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -41 - Pettus TWp41 - Pettus TWp | 15 | 37 | 1 | 53 | 28.3% | 69.8% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -29 - Indian Bayou TWP29 - Indian Bayou TWP | 9 | 35 | 1 | 45 | 20.0% | 77.8% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -30 - Coy City30 - Coy City | 6 | 38 | 0 | 44 | 13.6% | 86.4% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -44 - Richwood TWP44 - Richwood TWP | 10 | 33 | 0 | 43 | 23.3% | 76.7% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -26 - Hamilton TWP26 - Hamilton TWP | 1 | 33 | 0 | 34 | 2.9% | 97.1% | R+94.1 |
| Precinct -01 - Allport City01 - Allport City | 25 | 4 | 2 | 31 | 80.6% | 12.9% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -32 - Lafayette TWP32 - Lafayette TWP | 5 | 24 | 0 | 29 | 17.2% | 82.8% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -46 - Walls TWP46 - Walls TWP | 6 | 19 | 0 | 25 | 24.0% | 76.0% | R+52.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +35.0% |
| 1896 | +67.5% |
| 1900 | +32.1% |
| 1904 | +20.4% |
| 1908 | +38.6% |
| 1912 | +46.6% |
| 1916 | +61.8% |
| 1920 | +40.9% |
| 1924 | +47.7% |
| 1928 | +46.6% |
| 1932 | +88.5% |
| 1936 | +79.6% |
| 1940 | +70.8% |
| 1944 | +49.5% |
| 1948 | +56.2% |
| 1952 | +38.2% |
| 1956 | +24.4% |
| 1960 | +26.8% |
| 1964 | +2.4% |
| 1968 | +4.4% |
| 1972 | −35.7% |
| 1976 | +50.9% |
| 1980 | −0.1% |
| 1984 | −28.8% |
| 1988 | −20.1% |
| 1992 | +10.8% |
| 1996 | +10.2% |
| 2000 | −20.9% |
| 2004 | −31.5% |
| 2008 | −47.5% |
| 2012 | −50.8% |
| 2016 | −54.2% |
| 2020 | −52.8% |
| 2024 | −53.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 20.0%4,477 | 76.1%17,007 | 22,336 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 77.3%23,504 | 30,391 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 45,500 |
| 2020 | 49,741 |
| 2022 | 47,075 |
| 2024 | 50,732 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+231 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,651 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $55,005 in average income, against $75,049 for residents who stayed — 27% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+7.7 on average — 46 points more Democratic-leaning than Lonoke County, AR itself (R+53.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pulaski County, AR847D+22.1
- White County, AR238R+61.2
- Faulkner County, AR137R+32.3
- Saline County, AR100R+40.1
- Prairie County, AR49R+65.8
- Jefferson County, AR29D+20.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pulaski County, AR714
- White County, AR344
- Faulkner County, AR184
- Saline County, AR74
- Washington County, AR39
- Prairie County, AR38
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +294 |
| 2012 | +89 |
| 2013 | +235 |
| 2014 | +135 |
| 2015 | −421 |
| 2016 | +108 |
| 2017 | +761 |
| 2018 | +474 |
| 2019 | −242 |
| 2021 | +617 |
| 2022 | +447 |
| 2023 | +614 |
| 2024 | +309 |
| 2025 | +231 |
Lonoke County's population has climbed steadily as Little Rock commuters move east along I-40, and its presidential margins have widened in tandem, reaching R+53.7 in 2024 — among the larger swings in the state's exurban ring.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 88.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 54.2 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 53.7 points.
A population of 75,272, a 83% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,828 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Crawford County and Pope County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lonoke County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05085/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.