Randolph County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
29 precincts · 6,636 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -28 - Ward Three28 - Ward Three | 213 | 615 | 17 | 845 | 25.2% | 72.8% | R+47.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -29 - Demun Rural29 - Demun Rural | 115 | 625 | 16 | 756 | 15.2% | 82.7% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -26 - Ward One26 - Ward One | 154 | 466 | 20 | 640 | 24.1% | 72.8% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -27 - Ward Two27 - Ward Two | 110 | 446 | 10 | 566 | 19.4% | 78.8% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -19 - Shiloh19 - Shiloh | 66 | 371 | 5 | 442 | 14.9% | 83.9% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -17 - West Roanoke17 - West Roanoke | 74 | 331 | 5 | 410 | 18.0% | 80.7% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -08 - Foster08 - Foster | 50 | 285 | 4 | 339 | 14.7% | 84.1% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -15 - Richardson15 - Richardson | 30 | 248 | 9 | 287 | 10.5% | 86.4% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -04 - Columbia04 - Columbia | 30 | 238 | 2 | 270 | 11.1% | 88.1% | R+77.0 |
| Precinct -11 - Janes Creek11 - Janes Creek | 31 | 187 | 3 | 221 | 14.0% | 84.6% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -16 - East Roanoke16 - East Roanoke | 39 | 177 | 5 | 221 | 17.6% | 80.1% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -12 - Little Black12 - Little Black | 22 | 181 | 3 | 206 | 10.7% | 87.9% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -14 - Reyno14 - Reyno | 23 | 120 | 4 | 147 | 15.6% | 81.6% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -06 - Dalton06 - Dalton | 20 | 107 | 1 | 128 | 15.6% | 83.6% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -20 - Siloam20 - Siloam | 20 | 105 | 3 | 128 | 15.6% | 82.0% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -07 - Elevenpoint07 - Elevenpoint | 25 | 97 | 4 | 126 | 19.8% | 77.0% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -21 - Spring River21 - Spring River | 15 | 107 | 0 | 122 | 12.3% | 87.7% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -05 - Current River05 - Current River | 15 | 100 | 4 | 119 | 12.6% | 84.0% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -24 - Water Valley24 - Water Valley | 6 | 88 | 2 | 96 | 6.3% | 91.7% | R+85.4 |
| Precinct -23 - Warm Springs23 - Warm Springs | 15 | 75 | 0 | 90 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -18 - Running Lake18 - Running Lake | 8 | 76 | 4 | 88 | 9.1% | 86.4% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -09 - Ingram09 - Ingram | 9 | 67 | 1 | 77 | 11.7% | 87.0% | R+75.3 |
| Precinct -13 - Okean13 - Okean | 19 | 54 | 4 | 77 | 24.7% | 70.1% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -10 - Jackson10 - Jackson | 5 | 53 | 0 | 58 | 8.6% | 91.4% | R+82.8 |
| Precinct -02 - Bristow02 - Bristow | 11 | 42 | 2 | 55 | 20.0% | 76.4% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -22 - Union22 - Union | 6 | 43 | 1 | 50 | 12.0% | 86.0% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -03 - Butler03 - Butler | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -25 - Wiley25 - Wiley | 4 | 17 | 2 | 23 | 17.4% | 73.9% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -01 - Baker01 - Baker | 3 | 17 | 0 | 20 | 15.0% | 85.0% | R+70.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +72.1% |
| 1896 | +72.2% |
| 1900 | +52.5% |
| 1904 | +33.3% |
| 1908 | +43.4% |
| 1912 | +46.7% |
| 1916 | +54.5% |
| 1920 | +36.3% |
| 1924 | +31.7% |
| 1928 | +32.5% |
| 1932 | +80.9% |
| 1936 | +60.6% |
| 1940 | +55.7% |
| 1944 | +48.1% |
| 1948 | +66.9% |
| 1952 | +19.6% |
| 1956 | +22.3% |
| 1960 | −2.0% |
| 1964 | +34.1% |
| 1968 | +3.1% |
| 1972 | −25.7% |
| 1976 | +48.7% |
| 1980 | +8.3% |
| 1984 | −11.9% |
| 1988 | +4.1% |
| 1992 | +34.1% |
| 1996 | +25.3% |
| 2000 | +5.9% |
| 2004 | +3.8% |
| 2008 | −18.1% |
| 2012 | −27.8% |
| 2016 | −50.3% |
| 2020 | −60.8% |
| 2024 | −63.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 16.5%864 | 79.3%4,160 | 5,245 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 82.1%5,487 | 6,686 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 10,527 |
| 2020 | 10,623 |
| 2022 | 10,430 |
| 2024 | 10,541 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−25 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +744 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $43,847 in average income, against $55,843 for residents who stayed — 21% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+52.6 on average — 11 points more Democratic-leaning than Randolph County, AR itself (R+63.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lawrence County, AR95R+64.0
- Craighead County, AR44R+37.4
- Greene County, AR37R+61.2
- Clay County, AR21R+61.6
- Washington County, AR20R+6.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lawrence County, AR74
- Craighead County, AR51
- Clay County, AR30
- Greene County, AR28
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +28 |
| 2012 | −101 |
| 2013 | −173 |
| 2014 | −9 |
| 2015 | −82 |
| 2016 | +51 |
| 2017 | +228 |
| 2018 | +347 |
| 2019 | +13 |
| 2021 | +266 |
| 2022 | +46 |
| 2023 | +45 |
| 2024 | +110 |
| 2025 | −25 |
Randolph County, tucked into Arkansas's northeast corner along the Missouri border, recorded an R+63.7 presidential margin in 2024 — among the widest in the state — reflecting the deep rural realignment that has reshaped the Ozark fringe over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 80.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 63.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 63.7 points.
A population of 18,838, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $50,911 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lawrence County and Clay County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Randolph County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05121/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.