HarrisDemocratic59.8%92,038TrumpRepublican37.7%57,977KennedyIndependent1.1%1,761
D+22.1- Lead
- 34,061
- Total
- 153,924
- vs nation
- D+23.6
- Turnout
- 53.2%
Akashiccounty
Pulaski County, AR
Contests in this Place (86 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 53.2% of 291,720 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic60.0%101,947TrumpRepublican37.5%63,687JorgensenLibertarian1.0%1,668
D+22.5- Lead
- 38,260
- Total
- 169,956
- vs nation
- D+18.1
- Turnout
- 59.0%
ClintonDemocratic57.7%89,574TrumpRepublican39.5%61,257JohnsonLibertarian2.8%4,328
D+18.3- Lead
- 28,317
- Total
- 155,159
- vs nation
- D+16.2
- Turnout
- 56.2%
ObamaDemocratic54.7%87,248RomneyRepublican43.3%68,984GrayLibertarian1.2%1,952
D+11.5- Lead
- 18,264
- Total
- 159,381
- vs nation
- D+7.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic55.1%88,854McCainRepublican43.5%70,212OtherAll other candidates1.4%2,277
D+11.6- Lead
- 18,642
- Total
- 161,343
- vs nation
- D+4.3
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic55.0%84,532BushRepublican44.2%67,903OtherAll other candidates0.8%1,185
D+10.8- Lead
- 16,629
- Total
- 153,620
- vs nation
- D+13.3
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic53.7%68,320BushRepublican43.9%55,866NaderGreen1.4%1,756
D+9.8- Lead
- 12,454
- Total
- 127,151
- vs nation
- D+9.3
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic58.8%75,084DoleRepublican35.1%44,780PerotReform4.7%6,014
D+23.7- Lead
- 30,304
- Total
- 127,733
- vs nation
- D+15.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+22.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 399,8182024 5-year
- Population density
- 527 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 758 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $62,8732024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 48.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 36.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 8.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+79.2 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+26.2 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Richland County, SC · twin score 93.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 53.2%155,292 participants ÷ 291,720 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- +1.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 37.1%–40.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 155,292 | 291,720 ± 1,358 | 53.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 126,616 | 295,669 ± 1,303 | 42.8% | Audited | C/A |
| 170,870 | 289,726 ± 1,350 | 59.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 135,252 | 288,717 ± 1,191 | 46.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 161,370 | 286,890 ± 1,020 | 56.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 159,381 | 279,121 | 57.1% | Derived | — | |
| 161,343 | 271,918 | 59.3% | Derived | — | |
| 153,620 | 264,715 extrapolated | 58.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Pulaski County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Pulaski County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Fred Love0—
Supha Xayprasith-Mays0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 132 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
132 precincts · 153,924 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 033Precinct 033 | 971 | 1,322 | 46 | 2,339 | 41.5% | 56.5% | R+15.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 064Precinct 064 | 1,025 | 1,187 | 62 | 2,274 | 45.1% | 52.2% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 004Precinct 004 | 930 | 1,298 | 45 | 2,273 | 40.9% | 57.1% | R+16.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 068Precinct 068 | 1,182 | 919 | 80 | 2,181 | 54.2% | 42.1% | D+12.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 032Precinct 032 | 1,084 | 1,026 | 40 | 2,150 | 50.4% | 47.7% | D+2.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 096Precinct 096 | 1,700 | 363 | 45 | 2,108 | 80.6% | 17.2% | D+63.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 051Precinct 051 | 1,278 | 773 | 24 | 2,075 | 61.6% | 37.3% | D+24.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 005Precinct 005 | 872 | 1,116 | 52 | 2,040 | 42.7% | 54.7% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 072Precinct 072 | 1,165 | 769 | 71 | 2,005 | 58.1% | 38.4% | D+19.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 041Precinct 041 | 560 | 1,373 | 48 | 1,981 | 28.3% | 69.3% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 063Precinct 063 | 828 | 1,061 | 57 | 1,946 | 42.5% | 54.5% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 075Precinct 075 | 1,607 | 285 | 38 | 1,930 | 83.3% | 14.8% | D+68.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 036Precinct 036 | 938 | 938 | 31 | 1,907 | 49.2% | 49.2% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -Precinct 021Precinct 021 | 980 | 847 | 65 | 1,892 | 51.8% | 44.8% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 028Precinct 028 | 824 | 990 | 48 | 1,862 | 44.3% | 53.2% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 006Precinct 006 | 846 | 944 | 60 | 1,850 | 45.7% | 51.0% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 058Precinct 058 | 661 | 1,108 | 40 | 1,809 | 36.5% | 61.2% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 034Precinct 034 | 581 | 1,125 | 38 | 1,744 | 33.3% | 64.5% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 031Precinct 031 | 762 | 933 | 47 | 1,742 | 43.7% | 53.6% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 056Precinct 056 | 833 | 841 | 55 | 1,729 | 48.2% | 48.6% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 094Precinct 094 | 1,228 | 397 | 48 | 1,673 | 73.4% | 23.7% | D+49.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 073Precinct 073 | 989 | 624 | 58 | 1,671 | 59.2% | 37.3% | D+21.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 061Precinct 061 | 893 | 704 | 66 | 1,663 | 53.7% | 42.3% | D+11.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 037Precinct 037 | 826 | 763 | 51 | 1,640 | 50.4% | 46.5% | D+3.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 062Precinct 062 | 584 | 950 | 51 | 1,585 | 36.8% | 59.9% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 124Precinct 124 | 656 | 895 | 27 | 1,578 | 41.6% | 56.7% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 017Precinct 017 | 1,011 | 515 | 42 | 1,568 | 64.5% | 32.8% | D+31.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106Precinct 106 | 1,357 | 183 | 23 | 1,563 | 86.8% | 11.7% | D+75.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 067Precinct 067 | 751 | 763 | 48 | 1,562 | 48.1% | 48.8% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 069Precinct 069 | 876 | 617 | 52 | 1,545 | 56.7% | 39.9% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 019Precinct 019 | 866 | 581 | 52 | 1,499 | 57.8% | 38.8% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 055Precinct 055 | 661 | 792 | 44 | 1,497 | 44.2% | 52.9% | R+8.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 060Precinct 060 | 729 | 727 | 24 | 1,480 | 49.3% | 49.1% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 035Precinct 035 | 271 | 1,172 | 33 | 1,476 | 18.4% | 79.4% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 022Precinct 022 | 891 | 531 | 46 | 1,468 | 60.7% | 36.2% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 066Precinct 066 | 960 | 431 | 34 | 1,425 | 67.4% | 30.2% | D+37.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 030Precinct 030 | 739 | 648 | 33 | 1,420 | 52.0% | 45.6% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 081Precinct 081 | 854 | 509 | 46 | 1,409 | 60.6% | 36.1% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 085Precinct 085 | 954 | 399 | 39 | 1,392 | 68.5% | 28.7% | D+39.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 1,238 | 122 | 23 | 1,383 | 89.5% | 8.8% | D+80.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 027Precinct 027 | 596 | 731 | 34 | 1,361 | 43.8% | 53.7% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 013Precinct 013 | 542 | 784 | 32 | 1,358 | 39.9% | 57.7% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 015Precinct 015 | 1,030 | 270 | 48 | 1,348 | 76.4% | 20.0% | D+56.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 029Precinct 029 | 584 | 724 | 38 | 1,346 | 43.4% | 53.8% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 065Precinct 065 | 686 | 593 | 43 | 1,322 | 51.9% | 44.9% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 080Precinct 080 | 848 | 438 | 35 | 1,321 | 64.2% | 33.2% | D+31.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 1,140 | 159 | 16 | 1,315 | 86.7% | 12.1% | D+74.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 048Precinct 048 | 1,042 | 238 | 25 | 1,305 | 79.8% | 18.2% | D+61.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 1,131 | 149 | 23 | 1,303 | 86.8% | 11.4% | D+75.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 074Precinct 074 | 959 | 317 | 23 | 1,299 | 73.8% | 24.4% | D+49.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 002Precinct 002 | 655 | 623 | 20 | 1,298 | 50.5% | 48.0% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 001Precinct 001 | 605 | 645 | 24 | 1,274 | 47.5% | 50.6% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 090Precinct 090 | 760 | 451 | 37 | 1,248 | 60.9% | 36.1% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 008Precinct 008 | 629 | 575 | 27 | 1,231 | 51.1% | 46.7% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 044Precinct 044 | 743 | 445 | 22 | 1,210 | 61.4% | 36.8% | D+24.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 076Precinct 076 | 755 | 422 | 28 | 1,205 | 62.7% | 35.0% | D+27.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 091Precinct 091 | 726 | 414 | 48 | 1,188 | 61.1% | 34.8% | D+26.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 025Precinct 025 | 587 | 565 | 29 | 1,181 | 49.7% | 47.8% | D+1.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 018Precinct 018 | 815 | 302 | 27 | 1,144 | 71.2% | 26.4% | D+44.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 940 | 169 | 27 | 1,136 | 82.7% | 14.9% | D+67.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 122Precinct 122 | 1,050 | 62 | 20 | 1,132 | 92.8% | 5.5% | D+87.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 038Precinct 038 | 584 | 518 | 23 | 1,125 | 51.9% | 46.0% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 071Precinct 071 | 674 | 406 | 42 | 1,122 | 60.1% | 36.2% | D+23.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 092Precinct 092 | 662 | 421 | 31 | 1,114 | 59.4% | 37.8% | D+21.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 084Precinct 084 | 757 | 336 | 19 | 1,112 | 68.1% | 30.2% | D+37.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 098Precinct 098 | 938 | 135 | 29 | 1,102 | 85.1% | 12.3% | D+72.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 093Precinct 093 | 664 | 402 | 25 | 1,091 | 60.9% | 36.8% | D+24.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 083Precinct 083 | 735 | 317 | 31 | 1,083 | 67.9% | 29.3% | D+38.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 885 | 169 | 21 | 1,075 | 82.3% | 15.7% | D+66.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 007Precinct 007 | 386 | 659 | 29 | 1,074 | 35.9% | 61.4% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 089Precinct 089 | 704 | 327 | 31 | 1,062 | 66.3% | 30.8% | D+35.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 016Precinct 016 | 831 | 205 | 23 | 1,059 | 78.5% | 19.4% | D+59.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 121Precinct 121 | 914 | 110 | 24 | 1,048 | 87.2% | 10.5% | D+76.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 014Precinct 014 | 650 | 359 | 38 | 1,047 | 62.1% | 34.3% | D+27.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 057Precinct 057 | 590 | 424 | 33 | 1,047 | 56.4% | 40.5% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 077Precinct 077 | 771 | 244 | 28 | 1,043 | 73.9% | 23.4% | D+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 023Precinct 023 | 499 | 507 | 30 | 1,036 | 48.2% | 48.9% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 099Precinct 099 | 804 | 191 | 40 | 1,035 | 77.7% | 18.5% | D+59.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 887 | 95 | 26 | 1,008 | 88.0% | 9.4% | D+78.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 079Precinct 079 | 505 | 454 | 21 | 980 | 51.5% | 46.3% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 010Precinct 010 | 638 | 307 | 27 | 972 | 65.6% | 31.6% | D+34.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 088Precinct 088 | 663 | 273 | 36 | 972 | 68.2% | 28.1% | D+40.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 042Precinct 042 | 426 | 518 | 25 | 969 | 44.0% | 53.5% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 054Precinct 054 | 294 | 652 | 23 | 969 | 30.3% | 67.3% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 050Precinct 050 | 709 | 208 | 25 | 942 | 75.3% | 22.1% | D+53.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 082Precinct 082 | 604 | 302 | 33 | 939 | 64.3% | 32.2% | D+32.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 108Precinct 108 | 732 | 185 | 21 | 938 | 78.0% | 19.7% | D+58.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 012Precinct 012 | 537 | 358 | 22 | 917 | 58.6% | 39.0% | D+19.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 047Precinct 047 | 581 | 297 | 17 | 895 | 64.9% | 33.2% | D+31.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 026Precinct 026 | 464 | 405 | 25 | 894 | 51.9% | 45.3% | D+6.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 053Precinct 053 | 257 | 594 | 25 | 876 | 29.3% | 67.8% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 052Precinct 052 | 294 | 551 | 19 | 864 | 34.0% | 63.8% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 003Precinct 003 | 437 | 395 | 24 | 856 | 51.1% | 46.1% | D+4.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 086Precinct 086 | 661 | 168 | 17 | 846 | 78.1% | 19.9% | D+58.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 070Precinct 070 | 509 | 310 | 22 | 841 | 60.5% | 36.9% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 117Precinct 117 | 723 | 64 | 24 | 811 | 89.1% | 7.9% | D+81.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 011Precinct 011 | 228 | 561 | 15 | 804 | 28.4% | 69.8% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 116Precinct 116 | 718 | 69 | 17 | 804 | 89.3% | 8.6% | D+80.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 697 | 82 | 14 | 793 | 87.9% | 10.3% | D+77.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 107Precinct 107 | 627 | 139 | 25 | 791 | 79.3% | 17.6% | D+61.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 120Precinct 120 | 711 | 58 | 17 | 786 | 90.5% | 7.4% | D+83.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 009Precinct 009 | 532 | 228 | 17 | 777 | 68.5% | 29.3% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 115Precinct 115 | 647 | 109 | 19 | 775 | 83.5% | 14.1% | D+69.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 112Precinct 112 | 645 | 111 | 16 | 772 | 83.5% | 14.4% | D+69.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 046Precinct 046 | 552 | 194 | 15 | 761 | 72.5% | 25.5% | D+47.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 059Precinct 059 | 260 | 483 | 16 | 759 | 34.3% | 63.6% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 020Precinct 020 | 426 | 274 | 28 | 728 | 58.5% | 37.6% | D+20.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 119Precinct 119 | 666 | 46 | 12 | 724 | 92.0% | 6.4% | D+85.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 039Precinct 039 | 380 | 323 | 16 | 719 | 52.9% | 44.9% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 574 | 116 | 12 | 702 | 81.8% | 16.5% | D+65.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 087Precinct 087 | 464 | 206 | 24 | 694 | 66.9% | 29.7% | D+37.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 049Precinct 049 | 594 | 78 | 14 | 686 | 86.6% | 11.4% | D+75.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 078Precinct 078 | 437 | 212 | 22 | 671 | 65.1% | 31.6% | D+33.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 024Precinct 024 | 325 | 313 | 22 | 660 | 49.2% | 47.4% | D+1.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 100Precinct 100 | 539 | 111 | 8 | 658 | 81.9% | 16.9% | D+65.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 095Precinct 095 | 508 | 118 | 25 | 651 | 78.0% | 18.1% | D+59.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 043Precinct 043 | 324 | 264 | 24 | 612 | 52.9% | 43.1% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 114Precinct 114 | 572 | 27 | 13 | 612 | 93.5% | 4.4% | D+89.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 123Precinct 123 | 350 | 229 | 14 | 593 | 59.0% | 38.6% | D+20.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 132Precinct 132 | 490 | 73 | 7 | 570 | 86.0% | 12.8% | D+73.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 118Precinct 118 | 514 | 36 | 15 | 565 | 91.0% | 6.4% | D+84.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 097Precinct 097 | 347 | 186 | 13 | 546 | 63.6% | 34.1% | D+29.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 113Precinct 113 | 436 | 72 | 15 | 523 | 83.4% | 13.8% | D+69.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 443 | 48 | 7 | 498 | 89.0% | 9.6% | D+79.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 045Precinct 045 | 299 | 155 | 20 | 474 | 63.1% | 32.7% | D+30.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 129Precinct 129 | 387 | 80 | 3 | 470 | 82.3% | 17.0% | D+65.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 130Precinct 130 | 291 | 138 | 7 | 436 | 66.7% | 31.7% | D+35.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 128Precinct 128 | 282 | 131 | 10 | 423 | 66.7% | 31.0% | D+35.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 131Precinct 131 | 356 | 44 | 4 | 404 | 88.1% | 10.9% | D+77.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 127Precinct 127 | 322 | 11 | 5 | 338 | 95.3% | 3.3% | D+92.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 040Precinct 040 | 121 | 157 | 9 | 287 | 42.2% | 54.7% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 126Precinct 126 | 221 | 12 | 2 | 235 | 94.0% | 5.1% | D+88.9 |
presidential history
Party record book
Pulaski County, AR · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
89.5%
11,482 votes · D+79.2
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 85.5%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
62.9%
57,576 votes · R+26.2
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 58.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
101,947votes
60.0% of the vote · D+22.5
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 92,038 votes
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
77,651votes
58.2% of the vote · R+17.5
Runner-up · George H. W. Bush, 1988 · 70,562 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+56.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+30.9 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · +55.4 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+19.8pts R vs U.S.
Place D+2.8 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · George H. W. Bush, 1988 · +3.7 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
DStephanie FlowersState Senate · 8
RRicky HillState Senate · 11
DJamie ScottState Senate · 12
RJane EnglishState Senate · 13
DFred LoveState Senate · 15
RMark JohnsonState Senate · 17
DMark PerryState House · 66
RDavid RayState House · 69
DAlex HolladayState House · 70
RKeith BrooksState House · 78
DDenise EnnettState House · 80
Seats representing Pulaski County, AR. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 3 congressional, 6 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | D | 59.2%85,131 | 40.8%58,715 | 143,846 |
| 2020 | D | 59.8%101,339 | 40.2%68,154 | 169,493 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 248,101 |
| 2020 | 256,192 |
| 2022 | 242,385 |
| 2024 | 241,753 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−595 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −17,098 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,946 in average income, against $91,088 for residents who stayed — 41% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+24.5 on average — 47 points more Republican-leaning than Pulaski County, AR itself (D+22.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Saline County, AR1,126R+40.1
- Faulkner County, AR807R+32.3
- Lonoke County, AR714R+53.7
- Jefferson County, AR358D+20.1
- Garland County, AR216R+36.3
- White County, AR216R+61.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Saline County, AR1,338
- Lonoke County, AR847
- Faulkner County, AR813
- Washington County, AR327
- Dallas County, TX262
- Jefferson County, AR243
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +373 |
| 2012 | −817 |
| 2013 | −238 |
| 2014 | −1,520 |
| 2015 | −2,233 |
| 2016 | −2,002 |
| 2017 | −2,698 |
| 2018 | −2,936 |
| 2019 | −1,415 |
| 2021 | −1,824 |
| 2022 | +864 |
| 2023 | −720 |
| 2024 | −1,337 |
| 2025 | −595 |
Home to the state capital and its largest city, Pulaski County's urban concentration and majority-minority population produce margins that routinely run more than 20 points left of the statewide result.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 79.2 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 26.2 points in 1972. The 2024 margin was 22.1 points.
A population of 399,818, a 48% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $62,873 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Richland County and Leon County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Richland County
South Carolina
93.4twin score
2004–2024 trajectory≠ elasticity
Leon County
Florida
92.6twin score
2004–2024 trajectory≠ college share
Montgomery County
Ohio
92.4twin score
population scale2004–2024 trajectory≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Pulaski County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05119/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Pulaski County
Arkansas at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Pulaski County, Arkansas vote in 2024?
In 2024, Pulaski County, Arkansas voted Democratic by 22.1 points (D+22.1), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 153,924 votes cast, 92,038 went Democratic and 57,977 went Republican.
When did Pulaski County, Arkansas last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Pulaski County, Arkansas voted Republican was 1988.
How many people live in Pulaski County, Arkansas?
Pulaski County, Arkansas has a population of 399,818 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Pulaski County, Arkansas?
Median household income in Pulaski County, Arkansas is $62,873 — below the national median of $80,734. The Arkansas state median is $60,773.
What is the political history of Pulaski County, Arkansas?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Pulaski County, Arkansas from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 30 went Democratic and 4 went Republican.