Carver County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
71 precincts · 69,160 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CHASKA W-1 P-2CHASKA W-1 P-2 | 2,303 | 2,132 | 128 | 4,563 | 50.5% | 46.7% | D+3.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CARVERCARVER | 1,870 | 1,810 | 99 | 3,779 | 49.5% | 47.9% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -CHASKA W-4CHASKA W-4 | 1,932 | 1,577 | 91 | 3,600 | 53.7% | 43.8% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -CHASKA W-3CHASKA W-3 | 1,838 | 1,527 | 100 | 3,465 | 53.0% | 44.1% | D+9.0 |
| Precinct -WACONIA P-3WACONIA P-3 | 1,422 | 1,888 | 83 | 3,393 | 41.9% | 55.6% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-3CHANHASSEN P-3 | 1,726 | 1,323 | 96 | 3,145 | 54.9% | 42.1% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-4CHANHASSEN P-4 | 1,585 | 1,265 | 62 | 2,912 | 54.4% | 43.4% | D+11.0 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-5CHANHASSEN P-5 | 1,593 | 1,229 | 70 | 2,892 | 55.1% | 42.5% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-6CHANHASSEN P-6 | 1,544 | 1,259 | 86 | 2,889 | 53.4% | 43.6% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -WACONIA P-2WACONIA P-2 | 1,243 | 1,521 | 85 | 2,849 | 43.6% | 53.4% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -WATERTOWNWATERTOWN | 898 | 1,794 | 62 | 2,754 | 32.6% | 65.1% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-1CHANHASSEN P-1 | 1,595 | 1,029 | 70 | 2,694 | 59.2% | 38.2% | D+21.0 |
| Precinct -VICTORIA P-2VICTORIA P-2 | 1,273 | 1,350 | 63 | 2,686 | 47.4% | 50.3% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -CHASKA W-2 P-2CHASKA W-2 P-2 | 1,482 | 1,037 | 89 | 2,608 | 56.8% | 39.8% | D+17.1 |
| Precinct -CHANHASSEN P-2CHANHASSEN P-2 | 1,316 | 1,144 | 70 | 2,530 | 52.0% | 45.2% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -WACONIA P-1WACONIA P-1 | 1,113 | 1,247 | 57 | 2,417 | 46.0% | 51.6% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -NORWOOD YOUNG AMERICANORWOOD YOUNG AMERICA | 731 | 1,471 | 42 | 2,244 | 32.6% | 65.6% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -VICTORIA P-4VICTORIA P-4 | 1,026 | 1,127 | 38 | 2,191 | 46.8% | 51.4% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -CHASKA W-2 P-1CHASKA W-2 P-1 | 970 | 1,021 | 39 | 2,030 | 47.8% | 50.3% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -MAYERMAYER | 400 | 1,053 | 24 | 1,477 | 27.1% | 71.3% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -VICTORIA P-3VICTORIA P-3 | 590 | 792 | 25 | 1,407 | 41.9% | 56.3% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -COLOGNECOLOGNE | 467 | 832 | 29 | 1,328 | 35.2% | 62.7% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -VICTORIA P-1VICTORIA P-1 | 601 | 638 | 29 | 1,268 | 47.4% | 50.3% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -LAKETOWN TWPLAKETOWN TWP | 416 | 773 | 23 | 1,212 | 34.3% | 63.8% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -DAHLGREN TWPDAHLGREN TWP | 306 | 592 | 17 | 915 | 33.4% | 64.7% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -WATERTOWN TWPWATERTOWN TWP | 254 | 604 | 19 | 877 | 29.0% | 68.9% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -WACONIA TWPWACONIA TWP | 227 | 545 | 19 | 791 | 28.7% | 68.9% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -HOLLYWOOD TWPHOLLYWOOD TWP | 163 | 521 | 11 | 695 | 23.5% | 75.0% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -SAN FRANCISCO TWPSAN FRANCISCO TWP | 195 | 428 | 14 | 637 | 30.6% | 67.2% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -CAMDEN TWPCAMDEN TWP | 141 | 462 | 12 | 615 | 22.9% | 75.1% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -BENTON TWPBENTON TWP | 112 | 366 | 16 | 494 | 22.7% | 74.1% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -YOUNG AMERICA TWPYOUNG AMERICA TWP | 97 | 358 | 7 | 462 | 21.0% | 77.5% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -HAMBURGHAMBURG | 65 | 252 | 7 | 324 | 20.1% | 77.8% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -CHASKA W-1 P-1CHASKA W-1 P-1 | 144 | 124 | 11 | 279 | 51.6% | 44.4% | D+7.2 |
| Precinct -VICTORIA P-5VICTORIA P-5 | 124 | 148 | 7 | 279 | 44.4% | 53.0% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -NEW GERMANYNEW GERMANY | 50 | 187 | 3 | 240 | 20.8% | 77.9% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -HANCOCK TWPHANCOCK TWP | 57 | 160 | 2 | 219 | 26.0% | 73.1% | R+47.0 |
| Benton Twp. Voting District27_270190005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Camden Twp. Voting District27_270190010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Carver Voting District27_270190015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-127_270190020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-227_270190025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-327_270190030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-427_270190035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-527_270190036 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-627_270190037 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chanhassen P-727_270190038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-1 P-127_270190040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-1 P-227_270190043 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-2 P-127_270190045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-2 P-227_270190047 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-327_270190050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chaska W-427_270190055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Cologne Voting District27_270190065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dahlgren Twp. Voting District27_270190070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hamburg Voting District27_270190075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hancock Twp. Voting District27_270190080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hollywood Twp. Voting District27_270190085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Laketown Twp. Voting District27_270190090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Mayer Voting District27_270190095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| New Germany Voting District27_270190100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Norwood Young America Voting District27_270190105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| San Francisco Twp. Voting District27_270190110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Victoria P-127_270190115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Victoria P-227_270190117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waconia Twp. Voting District27_270190130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waconia W-127_270190120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waconia W-227_270190125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Watertown Twp. Voting District27_270190140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Watertown Voting District27_270190135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Young America Twp. Voting District27_270190150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +9.2% |
| 1896 | −18.5% |
| 1900 | −21.1% |
| 1904 | −43.2% |
| 1908 | −22.0% |
| 1912 | +9.6% |
| 1916 | −33.3% |
| 1920 | −77.6% |
| 1924 | −33.7% |
| 1928 | −15.9% |
| 1932 | +26.4% |
| 1936 | −3.9% |
| 1940 | −57.5% |
| 1944 | −57.3% |
| 1948 | −23.6% |
| 1952 | −51.0% |
| 1956 | −45.3% |
| 1960 | −22.0% |
| 1964 | −2.9% |
| 1968 | −17.5% |
| 1972 | −26.6% |
| 1976 | −3.8% |
| 1980 | −17.8% |
| 1984 | −27.8% |
| 1988 | −19.4% |
| 1992 | −7.0% |
| 1996 | −2.9% |
| 2000 | −23.8% |
| 2004 | −26.5% |
| 2008 | −15.1% |
| 2012 | −19.7% |
| 2016 | −13.6% |
| 2020 | −4.9% |
| 2024 | −5.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 64,655 |
| 2018 | 65,210 |
| 2020 | 72,991 |
| 2022 | 74,048 |
| 2024 | 79,297 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,139 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +10,788 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $105,522 in average income, against $149,239 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+23.0 on average — 28 points more Democratic-leaning than Carver County, MN itself (R+5.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hennepin County, MN1,553D+42.4
- Scott County, MN341R+8.5
- Dakota County, MN158D+12.8
- McLeod County, MN105R+37.8
- Ramsey County, MN95D+43.1
- Wright County, MN94R+29.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hennepin County, MN1,143
- Scott County, MN249
- Wright County, MN145
- Dakota County, MN140
- McLeod County, MN126
- Ramsey County, MN104
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +661 |
| 2012 | +318 |
| 2013 | +1,041 |
| 2014 | +944 |
| 2015 | +495 |
| 2016 | +967 |
| 2017 | +1,059 |
| 2018 | +716 |
| 2019 | +905 |
| 2021 | +997 |
| 2022 | +623 |
| 2023 | +162 |
| 2024 | +761 |
| 2025 | +1,139 |
Carver County sits on the southwestern edge of the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro, where rapid population growth since 2000 has gradually compressed what was once a double-digit Republican presidential margin to single digits by 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 26.4 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 77.6 points in 1920. The 2024 margin was 5.4 points.
A population of 110,041, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $125,946 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Scott County and Washington County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Carver County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27019/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.