- Lead
- 5,837
- Total
- 35,062
- vs nation
- R+15.2
- Turnout
- 61.8%
Sullivan County, NY
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.8% of 58,140 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,176
- Total
- 34,647
- vs nation
- R+13.6
- Turnout
- 63.2%
- Lead
- 3,363
- Total
- 29,955
- vs nation
- R+13.3
- Turnout
- 54.2%
- Lead
- 2,563
- Total
- 28,415
- vs nation
- D+5.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,950
- Total
- 31,183
- vs nation
- D+2.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 285
- Total
- 30,966
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,645
- Total
- 28,528
- vs nation
- D+5.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,731
- Total
- 28,244
- vs nation
- D+11.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+16.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 79,7212024 5-year
- Population density
- 82 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 968 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $72,3822024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 66.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 8.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 19.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+35.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+35.4 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Salem County, NJ · twin score 90.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 61.8%35,923 participants ÷ 58,140 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 41.3%–47.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35,923 | 58,140 ± 902 | 61.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 25,052 | 58,695 ± 723 | 42.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 35,568 | 56,319 ± 732 | 63.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 26,045 | 55,830 ± 627 | 46.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 30,484 | 56,216 ± 550 | 54.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 28,415 | 56,545 | 50.3% | Derived | — | |
| 31,183 | 55,571 | 56.1% | Derived | — | |
| 30,966 | 54,597 extrapolated | 56.7% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 90 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
90 precincts · 35,062 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 1400001361051400001 | 512 | 634 | 6 | 1,152 | 44.4% | 55.0% | R+10.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 1400002361051400002 | 378 | 548 | 4 | 930 | 40.6% | 58.9% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct 1500001361051500001 | 500 | 372 | 4 | 876 | 57.1% | 42.5% | D+14.6 |
| Precinct 0300001361050300001 | 361 | 512 | 2 | 875 | 41.3% | 58.5% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct 0900006361050900006 | 467 | 381 | 1 | 849 | 55.0% | 44.9% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct 0100004361050100004 | 398 | 439 | 1 | 838 | 47.5% | 52.4% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct 1200004361051200004 | 279 | 492 | 3 | 774 | 36.0% | 63.6% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct 0400001361050400001 | 430 | 334 | 3 | 767 | 56.1% | 43.5% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct 0500009361050500009 | 215 | 539 | 1 | 755 | 28.5% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct 0500003361050500003 | 255 | 492 | 4 | 751 | 34.0% | 65.5% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct 0800002361050800002 | 320 | 411 | 4 | 735 | 43.5% | 55.9% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct 1200001361051200001 | 243 | 483 | 1 | 727 | 33.4% | 66.4% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct 1400012361051400012 | 346 | 344 | 0 | 690 | 50.1% | 49.9% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct 1400003361051400003 | 245 | 431 | 1 | 677 | 36.2% | 63.7% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct 1000002361051000002 | 294 | 348 | 5 | 647 | 45.4% | 53.8% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct 0100001361050100001 | 258 | 378 | 1 | 637 | 40.5% | 59.3% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct 0200001361050200001 | 287 | 333 | 7 | 627 | 45.8% | 53.1% | R+7.3 |
| Precinct 0500002361050500002 | 148 | 437 | 3 | 588 | 25.2% | 74.3% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct 1100009361051100009 | 267 | 320 | 1 | 588 | 45.4% | 54.4% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct 1100003361051100003 | 215 | 362 | 3 | 580 | 37.1% | 62.4% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct 0900005361050900005 | 283 | 292 | 3 | 578 | 49.0% | 50.5% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct 1000001361051000001 | 213 | 348 | 3 | 564 | 37.8% | 61.7% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct 1100012361051100012 | 211 | 351 | 2 | 564 | 37.4% | 62.2% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct 0800001361050800001 | 273 | 284 | 1 | 558 | 48.9% | 50.9% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct 0700001361050700001 | 211 | 336 | 5 | 552 | 38.2% | 60.9% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct 1400009361051400009 | 374 | 172 | 1 | 547 | 68.4% | 31.4% | D+36.9 |
| Precinct 0500007361050500007 | 159 | 374 | 1 | 534 | 29.8% | 70.0% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct 0900007361050900007 | 128 | 400 | 1 | 529 | 24.2% | 75.6% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct 0400002361050400002 | 190 | 327 | 1 | 518 | 36.7% | 63.1% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct 0500006361050500006 | 219 | 292 | 3 | 514 | 42.6% | 56.8% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct 0200002361050200002 | 257 | 244 | 3 | 504 | 51.0% | 48.4% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct 1300002361051300002 | 237 | 265 | 2 | 504 | 47.0% | 52.6% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct 0600001361050600001 | 241 | 254 | 2 | 497 | 48.5% | 51.1% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct 0100003361050100003 | 225 | 268 | 0 | 493 | 45.6% | 54.4% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct 0500005361050500005 | 176 | 313 | 2 | 491 | 35.8% | 63.7% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct 1100001361051100001 | 190 | 271 | 3 | 464 | 40.9% | 58.4% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct 0500008361050500008 | 146 | 311 | 0 | 457 | 31.9% | 68.1% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct 1100004361051100004 | 164 | 285 | 1 | 450 | 36.4% | 63.3% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct 1100006361051100006 | 185 | 261 | 1 | 447 | 41.4% | 58.4% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct 0500001361050500001 | 101 | 344 | 1 | 446 | 22.6% | 77.1% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct 0900010361050900010 | 183 | 258 | 3 | 444 | 41.2% | 58.1% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct 1400007361051400007 | 179 | 253 | 2 | 434 | 41.2% | 58.3% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct 1100002361051100002 | 151 | 278 | 3 | 432 | 35.0% | 64.4% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct 1100008361051100008 | 173 | 241 | 2 | 416 | 41.6% | 57.9% | R+16.3 |
| Precinct 1300004361051300004 | 185 | 219 | 0 | 404 | 45.8% | 54.2% | R+8.4 |
| Precinct 1400010361051400010 | 233 | 152 | 0 | 385 | 60.5% | 39.5% | D+21.0 |
| Precinct 1400005361051400005 | 148 | 227 | 2 | 377 | 39.3% | 60.2% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct 0900003361050900003 | 151 | 219 | 1 | 371 | 40.7% | 59.0% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct 1100007361051100007 | 144 | 207 | 0 | 351 | 41.0% | 59.0% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct 1300005361051300005 | 145 | 175 | 0 | 320 | 45.3% | 54.7% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct 1400004361051400004 | 120 | 192 | 1 | 313 | 38.3% | 61.3% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct 1100010361051100010 | 127 | 182 | 2 | 311 | 40.8% | 58.5% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct 1300001361051300001 | 136 | 168 | 1 | 305 | 44.6% | 55.1% | R+10.5 |
| Precinct 0200003361050200003 | 113 | 182 | 1 | 296 | 38.2% | 61.5% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct 0500004361050500004 | 164 | 120 | 3 | 287 | 57.1% | 41.8% | D+15.3 |
| Precinct 1400006361051400006 | 181 | 102 | 0 | 283 | 64.0% | 36.0% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct 1100014361051100014 | 115 | 161 | 1 | 277 | 41.5% | 58.1% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct 0900008361050900008 | 45 | 224 | 0 | 269 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct 1200002361051200002 | 68 | 194 | 0 | 262 | 26.0% | 74.0% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct 1100011361051100011 | 9 | 244 | 0 | 253 | 3.6% | 96.4% | R+92.9 |
| Precinct 0900004361050900004 | 92 | 156 | 0 | 248 | 37.1% | 62.9% | R+25.8 |
| Precinct 1400008361051400008 | 119 | 91 | 0 | 210 | 56.7% | 43.3% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct 0900002361050900002 | 69 | 139 | 0 | 208 | 33.2% | 66.8% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct 0100002361050100002 | 64 | 142 | 1 | 207 | 30.9% | 68.6% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct 0900009361050900009 | 54 | 127 | 0 | 181 | 29.8% | 70.2% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct 1400011361051400011 | 85 | 88 | 0 | 173 | 49.1% | 50.9% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct 0700002361050700002 | 61 | 109 | 2 | 172 | 35.5% | 63.4% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct 0200004361050200004 | 62 | 97 | 2 | 161 | 38.5% | 60.2% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct 1100005361051100005 | 64 | 79 | 1 | 144 | 44.4% | 54.9% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct 1300003361051300003 | 53 | 88 | 0 | 141 | 37.6% | 62.4% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct 1100015361051100015 | 44 | 93 | 0 | 137 | 32.1% | 67.9% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct 0200005361050200005 | 66 | 69 | 1 | 136 | 48.5% | 50.7% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct 1100023361051100023 | 58 | 74 | 2 | 134 | 43.3% | 55.2% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct 1200003361051200003 | 56 | 73 | 0 | 129 | 43.4% | 56.6% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct 0100005361050100005 | 40 | 74 | 1 | 115 | 34.8% | 64.3% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct 0900001361050900001 | 41 | 56 | 1 | 98 | 41.8% | 57.1% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct 1300006361051300006 | 58 | 34 | 0 | 92 | 63.0% | 37.0% | D+26.1 |
| Precinct 1100021361051100021 | 25 | 52 | 1 | 78 | 32.1% | 66.7% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct 1100016361051100016 | 15 | 47 | 0 | 62 | 24.2% | 75.8% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct 1100024361051100024 | 13 | 35 | 0 | 48 | 27.1% | 72.9% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct 1100017361051100017 | 12 | 20 | 2 | 34 | 35.3% | 58.8% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct 1100027361051100027 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 34 | 26.5% | 73.5% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct 1100029361051100029 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 23 | 52.2% | 47.8% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct 1100028361051100028 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 19 | 15.8% | 84.2% | R+68.4 |
| Precinct 0500011361050500011 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct 0500010361050500010 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct 0500012361050500012 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct 1100018361051100018 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct 1100019361051100019 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct 1100026361051100026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Sullivan County, NY · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
67.5%
16,728 votes · D+35.2
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 54.0%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
64.4%
8,029 votes · R+35.4
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1956 · 63.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
16,850votes
54.0% of the vote · D+9.5
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 16,728 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
20,386votes
58.1% of the vote · R+16.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 18,665 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
+12.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+35.2 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Bill Clinton, 1996 · +11.8 pts
Republican
Alf Landon1936
+23.5pts R vs U.S.
Place D+0.8 · U.S. D+24.3
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1948 · +21.5 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Sullivan County, NY. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Sullivan County, NY registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 17-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
54,712 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−753 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −4,306 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $81,480 in average income, against $75,961 for residents who stayed — 7% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+13.0 on average — 30 points more Democratic-leaning than Sullivan County, NY itself (R+16.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Orange County, NY455R+8.4
- Kings County, NY209D+43.3
- Ulster County, NY129D+18.5
- Queens County, NY123D+24.2
- New York County, NY98D+64.2
- Bronx County, NY73D+45.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Orange County, NY338
- Ulster County, NY138
- Kings County, NY99
- Queens County, NY60
- New York County, NY52
- Rockland County, NY52
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −685 |
| 2012 | −382 |
| 2013 | −324 |
| 2014 | −1,549 |
| 2015 | −1,065 |
| 2016 | −128 |
| 2017 | −181 |
| 2018 | +151 |
| 2019 | +40 |
| 2021 | +1,255 |
| 2022 | −179 |
| 2023 | −86 |
| 2024 | −420 |
| 2025 | −753 |
Once a Democratic stronghold anchored by Borscht Belt tourism and labor voters, Sullivan County now votes Republican by double digits, reflecting a rural realignment visible across the broader Catskills region.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 35.4 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 7.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 16.6 points.
A population of 79,721, a 66% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,382 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Salem County and Monroe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sullivan County, New York. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/36105/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.