- Lead
- 5,954
- Total
- 31,018
- vs nation
- R+17.7
- Turnout
- 62.3%
Salem County, NJ
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.3% of 50,205 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,348
- Total
- 33,712
- vs nation
- R+17.4
- Turnout
- 70.3%
- Lead
- 4,477
- Total
- 29,853
- vs nation
- R+17.1
- Turnout
- 62.2%
- Lead
- 385
- Total
- 29,623
- vs nation
- R+2.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,228
- Total
- 31,363
- vs nation
- R+3.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,972
- Total
- 29,781
- vs nation
- R+4.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,461
- Total
- 26,972
- vs nation
- D+4.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,750
- Total
- 25,992
- vs nation
- D+2.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+19.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 65,2752024 5-year
- Population density
- 197 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 332 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $79,9602024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 70.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 13.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 11.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+34.5 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+60.7 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Sullivan County, NY · twin score 90.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 62.3%31,255 participants ÷ 50,205 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +32.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +0.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 29.4%–40.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31,255 | 50,205 ± 382 | 62.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 18,766 | 50,123 ± 373 | 37.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 34,046 | 48,431 ± 394 | 70.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 24,163 | 47,938 ± 392 | 50.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 30,048 | 48,347 ± 340 | 62.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 29,623 | 49,529 | 59.8% | Derived | — | |
| 31,363 | 49,140 | 63.8% | Derived | — | |
| 29,781 | 48,751 extrapolated | 61.1% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 43 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
43 precincts · 31,018 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Woodstown Borough Ward 00 District 01Woodstown Borough Ward 00 District 01 | 626 | 620 | 21 | 1,267 | 49.4% | 48.9% | D+0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Alloway Township Ward 00 District 01Alloway Township Ward 00 District 01 | 401 | 814 | 22 | 1,237 | 32.4% | 65.8% | R+33.4 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 06Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 06 | 422 | 792 | 18 | 1,232 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Upper Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 02Upper Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 02 | 303 | 860 | 17 | 1,180 | 25.7% | 72.9% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 09Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 09 | 332 | 650 | 26 | 1,008 | 32.9% | 64.5% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 02Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 02 | 471 | 518 | 18 | 1,007 | 46.8% | 51.4% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 04Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 04 | 528 | 423 | 19 | 970 | 54.4% | 43.6% | D+10.8 |
| Precinct -Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 02Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 02 | 366 | 589 | 11 | 966 | 37.9% | 61.0% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 04Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 04 | 347 | 594 | 13 | 954 | 36.4% | 62.3% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 01Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 01 | 390 | 530 | 26 | 946 | 41.2% | 56.0% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 02Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 02 | 300 | 598 | 10 | 908 | 33.0% | 65.9% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 05Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 05 | 362 | 506 | 21 | 889 | 40.7% | 56.9% | R+16.2 |
| Precinct -Upper Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 01Upper Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 01 | 226 | 643 | 18 | 887 | 25.5% | 72.5% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -Woodstown Borough Ward 00 District 02Woodstown Borough Ward 00 District 02 | 502 | 364 | 18 | 884 | 56.8% | 41.2% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -Alloway Township Ward 00 District 02Alloway Township Ward 00 District 02 | 252 | 617 | 11 | 880 | 28.6% | 70.1% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 03Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 03 | 287 | 571 | 12 | 870 | 33.0% | 65.6% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 05Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 05 | 313 | 518 | 13 | 844 | 37.1% | 61.4% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -Mannington Township Ward 00 District 01Mannington Township Ward 00 District 01 | 276 | 507 | 10 | 793 | 34.8% | 63.9% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -Quinton Township Ward 00 District 01Quinton Township Ward 00 District 01 | 239 | 534 | 12 | 785 | 30.4% | 68.0% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 01Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 01 | 256 | 502 | 19 | 777 | 32.9% | 64.6% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Elmer Borough Ward 00 District 01Elmer Borough Ward 00 District 01 | 275 | 479 | 11 | 765 | 35.9% | 62.6% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 06Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 06 | 262 | 441 | 11 | 714 | 36.7% | 61.8% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 02Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 02 | 271 | 427 | 8 | 706 | 38.4% | 60.5% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 07Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 07 | 256 | 434 | 10 | 700 | 36.6% | 62.0% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 01Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 01 | 241 | 450 | 9 | 700 | 34.4% | 64.3% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Elsinboro Township Ward 00 District 01Elsinboro Township Ward 00 District 01 | 235 | 448 | 12 | 695 | 33.8% | 64.5% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 05Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 05 | 411 | 251 | 10 | 672 | 61.2% | 37.4% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 08Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 08 | 224 | 429 | 12 | 665 | 33.7% | 64.5% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 04Pittsgrove Township Ward 00 District 04 | 300 | 353 | 10 | 663 | 45.2% | 53.2% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -Oldmans Township Ward 00 District 01Oldmans Township Ward 00 District 01 | 282 | 359 | 17 | 658 | 42.9% | 54.6% | R+11.7 |
| Precinct -Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 03Pilesgrove Township Ward 00 District 03 | 261 | 372 | 7 | 640 | 40.8% | 58.1% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 03Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 03 | 304 | 296 | 11 | 611 | 49.8% | 48.4% | D+1.3 |
| Precinct -Quinton Township Ward 00 District 02Quinton Township Ward 00 District 02 | 211 | 380 | 7 | 598 | 35.3% | 63.5% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 03Pennsville Township Ward 00 District 03 | 197 | 365 | 13 | 575 | 34.3% | 63.5% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -Oldmans Township Ward 00 District 02Oldmans Township Ward 00 District 02 | 197 | 361 | 8 | 566 | 34.8% | 63.8% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 01Carneys Point Township Ward 00 District 01 | 286 | 264 | 8 | 558 | 51.3% | 47.3% | D+3.9 |
| Precinct -Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 01Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 01 | 377 | 160 | 2 | 539 | 69.9% | 29.7% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 03Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 03 | 300 | 94 | 3 | 397 | 75.6% | 23.7% | D+51.9 |
| Precinct -Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 02Penns Grove Borough Ward 00 District 02 | 186 | 116 | 10 | 312 | 59.6% | 37.2% | D+22.4 |
| Precinct -Lower Alloways Creek Township Ward 00 District 01Lower Alloways Creek Township Ward 00 District 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Lower Alloways Creek Township Ward 00 District 02Lower Alloways Creek Township Ward 00 District 02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Salem City Ward East District 01Salem City Ward East District 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Salem City Ward West District 01Salem City Ward West District 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Salem County, NJ · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
67.2%
17,846 votes · D+34.5
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · 59.9%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
80.2%
12,323 votes · R+60.7
Runner-up · Calvin Coolidge, 1924 · 68.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
17,846votes
67.2% of the vote · D+34.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 16,044 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
18,827votes
55.8% of the vote · R+12.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 18,229 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
+11.9pts D vs U.S.
Place D+34.5 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · +10.2 pts
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
+43.2pts R vs U.S.
Place R+60.7 · U.S. R+17.5
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1932 · +32.2 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Salem County, NJ. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 15 points more Republican than the rolls.
50,398 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+422 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,046 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $60,953 in average income, against $79,859 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+12.1 on average — 31 points more Democratic-leaning than Salem County, NJ itself (R+19.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Gloucester County, NJ398R+2.8
- Cumberland County, NJ225R+3.7
- Camden County, NJ167D+27.4
- New Castle County, DE107D+32.6
- Philadelphia County, PA100D+58.8
- Delaware County, PA58D+23.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Gloucester County, NJ285
- Cumberland County, NJ214
- New Castle County, DE123
- Camden County, NJ122
- Philadelphia County, PA62
- Atlantic County, NJ48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −154 |
| 2012 | −490 |
| 2013 | −645 |
| 2014 | −477 |
| 2015 | −635 |
| 2016 | −509 |
| 2017 | −286 |
| 2018 | −204 |
| 2019 | −300 |
| 2021 | +370 |
| 2022 | +265 |
| 2023 | +261 |
| 2024 | +336 |
| 2025 | +422 |
Salem County's agricultural flatlands and small manufacturing towns anchor a voter base that has moved Republican by double digits over the past two presidential cycles, reaching R+19.2 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.5 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 60.7 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 19.2 points.
A population of 65,275, a 70% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $79,960 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sullivan County and Monroe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Salem County, New Jersey. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/34033/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.